Suppr超能文献

面部不对称中颞点与外耳道的位置对称性。

Positional symmetry of porion and external auditory meatus in facial asymmetry.

作者信息

Choi Ji Wook, Jung Seo Yeon, Kim Hak-Jin, Lee Sang-Hwy

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu 120-752 Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Oct 1;37(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40902-015-0033-1. eCollection 2015 Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The porion (Po) is used to construct the Frankfort horizontal (FH) plane for cephalometrics, and the external auditory meatus (EAM) is to transfer and mount the dental model with facebow. The classical assumption is that EAM represents Po by the parallel positioning. However, we are sometimes questioning about the possible positional disparity between Po and EAM, when the occlusal cant or facial midline is different from our clinical understandings. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the positional parallelism of Po and EAM in facial asymmetries, and also to investigate their relationship with the maxillary occlusal cant.

METHODS

The 67 subjects were classified into three groups. Group I had normal subjects with facial symmetry (1.05 ± 0.52 mm of average chin deviation) with minimal occlusal cant (<1.5 mm). Asymmetry group II-A had no maxillary occlusal cant (average 0.60 ± 0.36), while asymmetry group II-B had occlusal cant (average 3.72 ± 1.47). The distances of bilateral Po, EAM, and mesiobuccal cusp tips of the maxillary first molars (Mx) from the horizontal orbital plane (Orb) and the coronal plane were measured on the three-dimensional computed tomographic images. Their right and left side distance discrepancies were calculated and statistically compared.

RESULTS

EAM was located 10.3 mm below and 2.3 mm anterior to Po in group I.  The vertical distances from Po to EAM of both sides were significantly different in group II-B ( = 0.001), while other groups were not. Interside discrepancy of the vertical distances from EAM to Mx in group II-B also showed the significant differences, as compared with those from Po to Mx and from Orb to Mx.

CONCLUSIONS

The subjects with facial asymmetry and prominent maxillary occlusal cant tend to have the symmetric position of Po but asymmetric EAM. Some caution or other measures will be helpful for them to be used during the clinical procedures.

摘要

背景

耳点(Po)用于构建用于头影测量的法兰克福平面(FH),外耳道(EAM)用于通过面弓转移和安装牙模。传统假设是通过平行定位,EAM代表Po。然而,当咬合斜度或面部中线与我们的临床认知不同时,我们有时会质疑Po和EAM之间可能存在的位置差异。本研究的目的是评估面部不对称情况下Po和EAM的位置平行性,并研究它们与上颌咬合斜度的关系。

方法

67名受试者被分为三组。第一组为面部对称的正常受试者(平均颏部偏斜1.05±0.52mm),咬合斜度最小(<1.5mm)。不对称第二组A没有上颌咬合斜度(平均0.60±0.36),而不对称第二组B有咬合斜度(平均3.72±1.47)。在三维计算机断层扫描图像上测量双侧Po、EAM以及上颌第一磨牙近中颊尖(Mx)到水平眶平面(Orb)和冠状平面的距离。计算它们左右侧的距离差异并进行统计学比较。

结果

在第一组中,EAM位于Po下方10.3mm且前方2.3mm处。在第二组B中,两侧从Po到EAM的垂直距离有显著差异(P=0.001),而其他组没有。与从Po到Mx以及从Orb到Mx的垂直距离相比,第二组B中从EAM到Mx的垂直距离的组内差异也显示出显著差异。

结论

面部不对称且上颌咬合斜度明显的受试者倾向于Po位置对称但EAM不对称。在临床操作过程中,对它们采取一些谨慎措施或其他方法会有所帮助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2284/5126933/5091c7eca4cb/40902_2015_33_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验