Maveli Thomas C, Suprono Montry S, Kattadiyil Mathew T, Goodacre Charles J, Bahjri Khaled
Graduate student, Advanced Specialty Education Program in Prosthodontics, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, Calif.
Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, Calif.
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Oct;114(4):566-73. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.02.030. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
The sagittal and coronal orientation of the maxillary occlusal plane plays an important role in the esthetic and functional outcome of dental prostheses. The accuracy of contemporary facebow transfer systems in transferring this orientation to semiadjustable articulators has not been quantified.
The purpose of this in vitro investigation was to analyze the sagittal and coronal orientation of the occlusal plane with 5 different facebow transfer systems.
A phantom head containing a maxillary typodont (control) was oriented so that the Frankfort horizontal plane was horizontal. The angle between the occlusal plane of the maxillary arch of the phantom head and the Frankfort horizontal plane was measured along the sagittal and coronal planes with a digital protractor. Fifteen facebow records using each of 5 facebow transfer systems (test groups) were made on the phantom head containing the maxillary typodont. Diagnostic casts of the maxillary typodont were mounted on semi-adjustable arcon articulators from the facebow records. The same angles measured on the control were measured on the test groups. These angles were compared with the same angle measured on the maxillary arch of the phantom head (control). All measurements were made by 2 operators.
Significant differences in the sagittal and coronal orientation of the occlusal plane were noted. Compared with the control, the Denar system had the least significant difference in the coronal orientation of the occlusal plane, while the Pana-Mount system had the least significant difference in the sagittal orientation of the occlusal plane. An intergroup comparison of the test groups showed significant differences among the groups. The Kois system showed the greatest difference in the coronal plane orientation, while the Denar system showed the greatest difference in the sagittal plane orientation.
None of the tested facebow systems exactly replicated the sagittal and coronal orientation of the maxillary occlusal plane. Significant differences in the sagittal and coronal orientation of the occlusal plane were observed between the test groups and the control. Intergroup comparisons revealed significant differences in the sagittal and coronal orientation of the occlusal plane.
上颌牙合平面的矢状位和冠状位在牙修复体的美学和功能效果中起着重要作用。当代面弓转移系统将该方向转移至半可调牙合架的准确性尚未得到量化。
本体外研究的目的是分析5种不同面弓转移系统的牙合平面矢状位和冠状位。
将含有上颌标准牙列模型(对照)的仿真头摆放至法兰克福水平面呈水平。使用数字量角器沿矢状面和冠状面测量仿真头上颌牙弓牙合平面与法兰克福水平面之间的角度。使用5种面弓转移系统(测试组)中的每一种在含有上颌标准牙列模型的仿真头上制作15次面弓记录。根据面弓记录将上颌标准牙列模型的诊断模型安装在半可调Arcon牙合架上。在测试组中测量与对照相同的角度。将这些角度与在仿真头上颌牙弓(对照)上测量的相同角度进行比较。所有测量均由2名操作人员进行。
观察到牙合平面矢状位和冠状位存在显著差异。与对照相比,Denar系统在牙合平面冠状位的差异最小,而Pana-Mount系统在牙合平面矢状位的差异最小。测试组的组间比较显示组间存在显著差异。Kois系统在冠状面方向上的差异最大,而Denar系统在矢状面方向上的差异最大。
所测试的面弓系统均未精确复制上颌牙合平面的矢状位和冠状位。测试组与对照组之间在牙合平面矢状位和冠状位上观察到显著差异。组间比较显示牙合平面矢状位和冠状位存在显著差异。