Long Andrew J, Burton Paul R, Laurie Cheryl P, Anderson Margaret L, Hebbard Geoff S, O'Brien Paul E, Brown Wendy A
Centre for Obesity Research and Education, Monash University, Melbourne, 3004, Australia.
Monash University, Department of Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, 99 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, 3004, Australia.
Obes Surg. 2016 May;26(5):1090-6. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1881-6.
The objective of the study is to identify the efficacy and safety of combining laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding with repair of large para-oesophageal hernias.
Para-oesophageal hernias are more common in the obese with higher recurrence rates following repair. The effect and safety of combining para-oesophageal hernia repair with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is unknown.
One-hundred fourteen consecutive patients undergoing primary laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding with concurrent repair of a large para-oesophageal hernia were prospectively identified and matched to a control group undergoing primary laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding only. Weight loss and complication data were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database, and a standardised bariatric outcome questionnaire was used to assess post-operative symptoms, satisfaction with surgery and satiety scores.
At a mean follow up of 4.9 ± 2.1 years, total weight loss was 16.4 ± 9.9% in the hernia repair group and 17.6 ± 12.6% in the control group (p = 0.949), with 17 vs. 11% loss to follow up rates (p = 0.246). No statistically significant difference in revisional surgery rate and symptomatic recurrence of hiatal hernia was documented in four patients in the hernia repair group (3.5%). No statistically significant difference in mean reflux (9.9 vs. 10.3, p = 0.821), dysphagia (20.7 vs. 20.1, p = 0.630) or satiety scores was identified.
Concurrent repair of large para-oesophageal hiatal hernia and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding placement is safe and effective both in terms of symptom control and weight loss over the intermediate term. In obese patients with large hiatal hernias, consideration should be given to combining repair of the hernia with a bariatric procedure.
本研究的目的是确定腹腔镜可调节胃束带术联合大型食管旁疝修补术的疗效和安全性。
食管旁疝在肥胖人群中更为常见,修补术后复发率较高。食管旁疝修补术联合腹腔镜可调节胃束带术的效果和安全性尚不清楚。
前瞻性纳入114例连续接受初次腹腔镜可调节胃束带术并同期修补大型食管旁疝的患者,并与仅接受初次腹腔镜可调节胃束带术的对照组进行匹配。从前瞻性维护的数据库中检索体重减轻和并发症数据,并使用标准化的减肥结果问卷评估术后症状、手术满意度和饱腹感评分。
平均随访4.9±2.1年,疝修补组的总体重减轻为16.4±9.9%,对照组为17.6±12.6%(p=0.949),失访率分别为17%和11%(p=0.246)。疝修补组4例患者(3.5%)的翻修手术率和食管裂孔疝症状复发率无统计学显著差异。平均反流(9.9对10.3,p=0.821)、吞咽困难(20.7对20.1,p=0.630)或饱腹感评分无统计学显著差异。
中期而言,大型食管旁裂孔疝同期修补术和腹腔镜可调节胃束带置入术在症状控制和体重减轻方面都是安全有效的。对于患有大型食管裂孔疝的肥胖患者,应考虑将疝修补术与减肥手术相结合。