Suppr超能文献

在评估10岁以下儿童急性腹痛方面,CT与超声相比的诊断价值。

Diagnostic value of CT compared to ultrasound in the evaluation of acute abdominal pain in children younger than 10 years old.

作者信息

Simanovsky Natalia, Dola Tamar, Hiller Nurith

机构信息

Department of Medical Imaging, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, POB 24035, Jerusalem, 91120, Israel.

出版信息

Emerg Radiol. 2016 Feb;23(1):23-27. doi: 10.1007/s10140-015-1351-4. Epub 2015 Oct 9.

Abstract

To assess the diagnostic value of ultrasound compared to CT in evaluating acute abdominal pain of different causes in children 10 years of age and under, hospital records and imaging files of 4052 patients under age of 10 who had imaging for abdominal pain were reviewed. One-hundred-thirty-two patients (3 %), (74 males/58 females) who underwent ultrasound and CT within 24 h were divided by age: group I, ages 0-48 months (25 patients); group II, 49-84 months (53 patients); and group III, 85-120 months (54 patients). Diagnoses at ultrasound, CT, and discharge were compared. Cases of a change in diagnosis following CT and impact of the changed diagnosis on patient management were assessed. Non-diagnostic ultrasound or a diagnostic conundrum was present in a small percentage (3 %) of our patients. In the group of patients imaged with two modalities, CT changed the diagnosis in 73/132 patients (55.3 %). Patient management changed in 63/132 patients (47.7 %). CT changed the diagnosis in 46/64 patients with surgical conditions (71.8 %, p < 0.001). Among patients with surgical conditions, the difference between ultrasonography (US) and CT diagnoses was significant in groups 2 (p = 0.046) and 3 (p =  .001). The impact of the change in diagnosis in surgical patients imaged with two modalities was significant in the group as a whole and in each age group separately. Non-diagnostic or equivocal US in a small percentage of patients is probably sufficient to justify the additional radiation burden.

摘要

为评估超声与CT相比在评估10岁及以下儿童不同病因急性腹痛中的诊断价值,我们回顾了4052例10岁以下因腹痛接受影像学检查的患者的医院记录和影像文件。132例(3%)患者(74例男性/58例女性)在24小时内接受了超声和CT检查,按年龄分为:I组,0至48个月(25例患者);II组,49至84个月(53例患者);III组,85至120个月(54例患者)。比较了超声、CT及出院时的诊断结果。评估了CT检查后诊断改变的病例以及诊断改变对患者治疗的影响。在我们的患者中,一小部分(3%)存在非诊断性超声或诊断难题。在接受两种检查的患者组中,CT改变了73/132例患者(55.3%)的诊断。63/132例患者(47.7%)的治疗方案发生了改变。CT改变了46/64例外科疾病患者的诊断(71.8%,p<0.001)。在患有外科疾病的患者中,超声(US)和CT诊断之间的差异在第2组(p=0.046)和第3组(p=0.001)中具有统计学意义。在接受两种检查的外科患者中,诊断改变的影响在整个组以及各个年龄组中均具有统计学意义。一小部分患者的非诊断性或可疑性超声可能足以证明额外的辐射负担是合理的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验