Suppr超能文献

巴基斯坦卡拉奇部分牙科诊所的灭菌方法及灭菌监测

Methods of Sterilization and Monitoring of Sterilization AcrossSelected Dental Practices in Karachi, Pakistan.

作者信息

Ahmed Hina

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry, Ziauddin College of Dentistry/Ziauddin University, Karachi.

出版信息

J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2015 Oct;25(10):713-6. doi: 10.2015/JCPSP.713716.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess methods of sterilization in dental practices in Karachi and secondly to investigate methods of monitoring sterilization in dental practices in Karachi, Pakistan.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional, descriptive study.

PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY

Dental colleges, hospitals and private clinics of Karachi, Pakistan, from January to March 2013.

METHODOLOGY

A total of 251 questionnaires were obtained. Descriptive statistics were computed and differences between groups were assessed through chi-square test using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0. P-value < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant.

RESULTS

Autoclave, used by 155 (61.8%) dentists was the most common method of sterilization followed by more than one method, 65 (25.9%); dry heat, 24 (9.6%); and cold sterilization, 7 (2.8%). Majority of dentists, 126 (50.1%), never monitored sterilization and those who did monitored mostly monthly. Statistically significant difference was found amongst the three groups of dentists monitoring sterilization (p=0.09) and methods of sterilization (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Statistically significant difference was found in infection control practices of specialists, postgraduate trainees and general dentists regarding method of monitoring sterilization with majority of dentists never monitoring sterilization.

摘要

目的

评估卡拉奇牙科诊所的灭菌方法,其次调查巴基斯坦卡拉奇牙科诊所的灭菌监测方法。

研究设计

横断面描述性研究。

研究地点和时间

2013年1月至3月,巴基斯坦卡拉奇的牙科学院、医院和私人诊所。

方法

共收集到251份问卷。计算描述性统计数据,并使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)16.0版通过卡方检验评估组间差异。P值<0.05被视为具有统计学意义。

结果

155名(61.8%)牙医使用的高压灭菌器是最常见的灭菌方法,其次是多种方法联合使用,共65名(25.9%);干热灭菌,24名(9.6%);冷灭菌,7名(2.8%)。大多数牙医,即126名(50.1%),从未进行过灭菌监测,而进行监测的牙医大多每月监测一次。在三组进行灭菌监测的牙医(p = 0.09)和灭菌方法(p < 0.01)之间发现了统计学上的显著差异。

结论

在灭菌监测方法方面,专科医生、研究生学员和普通牙医的感染控制实践存在统计学上的显著差异,大多数牙医从未进行过灭菌监测。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验