Department of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
JACC Heart Fail. 2015 Nov;3(11):896-905. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare long-term outcomes after myectomy and alcohol septal ablation (ASA) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).
Surgical myectomy and ASA are both accepted treatment options for medical therapy-resistant obstructive HCM. Previous meta-analyses only evaluated short-term outcomes.
A systematic review was conducted for eligible studies with a follow-up of at least 3 years. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and (aborted) sudden cardiac death (SCD). Secondary outcomes were periprocedural complications, left ventricular outflow tract gradient, and New York Heart Association functional class after ≥3 months, and reintervention. Pooled estimates were calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis.
Sixteen myectomy cohorts (n = 2,791; mean follow-up, 7.4 years) and 11 ASA cohorts (n = 2,013; mean follow-up, 6.2 years) were included. Long-term mortality was found to be similarly low after ASA (1.5% per year) compared with myectomy (1.4% per year, p = 0.78). The rate of (aborted) SCD, including appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks, was 0.4% per year after ASA and 0.5% per year after myectomy (p = 0.47). Permanent pacemaker implantation was performed after ASA in 10% of the patients compared with 4.4% after myectomy (p < 0.001). Reintervention was performed in 7.7% of the patients who underwent ASA compared with 1.6% after myectomy (p = 0.001).
Long-term mortality and (aborted) SCD rates after ASA and myectomy are similarly low. Patients who undergo ASA have more than twice the risk of permanent pacemaker implantation and a 5 times higher risk of the need for additional septal reduction therapy compared with those who undergo myectomy.
本荟萃分析旨在比较肥厚型心肌病(HCM)患者接受心肌切除术和酒精室间隔消融术(ASA)后的长期疗效。
外科心肌切除术和 ASA 均为药物治疗抵抗性梗阻性 HCM 的有效治疗选择。既往荟萃分析仅评估了短期疗效。
对至少随访 3 年的合格研究进行系统评价。主要终点为全因死亡率和(心源性)猝死(SCD)。次要终点为 3 个月后围手术期并发症、左心室流出道梯度和纽约心脏协会心功能分级,以及再次介入治疗。使用随机效应荟萃分析计算汇总估计值。
纳入了 16 项心肌切除术队列(n = 2791;平均随访时间 7.4 年)和 11 项 ASA 队列(n = 2013;平均随访时间 6.2 年)。ASA 组的长期死亡率与心肌切除术组(1.4%/年)相似(1.5%/年,p = 0.78)。ASA 组和心肌切除术组的(心源性)SCD 发生率(包括适当的植入式心脏复律除颤器电击)分别为 0.4%/年和 0.5%/年(p = 0.47)。ASA 组中有 10%的患者需要植入永久性起搏器,而心肌切除术组中则为 4.4%(p < 0.001)。ASA 组中有 7.7%的患者需要再次介入治疗,而心肌切除术组中则为 1.6%(p = 0.001)。
ASA 和心肌切除术的长期死亡率和(心源性)SCD 发生率相似。与接受心肌切除术的患者相比,接受 ASA 的患者需要植入永久性起搏器的风险增加了两倍以上,需要再次行间隔消融术的风险增加了 5 倍以上。