Jiang Tingting, Dai Yongmei, Miao Miao, Zhang Yue, Song Chenglin, Wang Zhixu
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2015 Jul;44(4):586-92.
To evaluate the usefulness and efficiency of a novel dietary method among urban pregnant women.
Sixty one pregnant women were recruited from the ward and provided with a meal accurately weighed before cooking. The meal was photographed from three different angles before and after eating. The subjects were also interviewed for 24 h dietary recall by the investigators. Food weighting, image quantification and 24 h dietary recall were conducted by investigators from three different groups, and the messages were isolated from each other. Food consumption was analyzed on bases of classification and total summation. Nutrient intake from the meal was calculated for each subject. The data obtained from the dietary recall and the image quantification were compared with the actual values. Correlation and regression analyses were carried out on values between weight method and image quantification as well as dietary recall.
Total twenty three kinds of food including rice, vegetables, fish, meats and soy bean curd were included in the experimental meal for the study. Compared with data from 24 h dietary recall (r = 0.413, P < 0.05), food weight estimated by image quantification (r = 0.778, P < 0.05, n = 308) were more correlated with weighed data, and show more concentrated linear distribution. Absolute difference distribution between image quantification and weight method of all food was 77.23 ± 56.02 (P < 0.05, n = 61), which was much small than the difference (172.77 ± 115.18) between 24 h recall and weight method. Values of almost all nutrients, including energy, protein, fat, carbohydrate, vitamin A, vitamin C, calcium, iron and zine calculated based on food weight from image quantification were more close to those of weighed data compared with 24 h dietary recall (P < 0.01). The results found by the Bland Altman analysis showed that the majority of the measurements for nutrient intake, were scattered along the mean difference line and close to the equality line (difference = 0). The plots show fairly good agreement between estimated and actual food consumption. It indicate that the differences (including the outliers) were random and did not exhibit any systematic bias, being consistent over different levels of mean food amount. On the other hand, the questionnaire showed that fifty six pregnant women considered the image quantification was less time-consuming and burdened than 24 h recall. Fifty eight of them would like to use image quantification to know their dietary status.
The novel method which called instant photography (image quantification) for dietary assessment is more effective than conventional 24 h dietary recall and it also can obtain food intake values close to weighed data.
评估一种新型饮食方法在城市孕妇中的实用性和有效性。
从病房招募61名孕妇,为她们提供烹饪前精确称重的一餐。用餐前后从三个不同角度对餐食进行拍照。研究人员还对受试者进行了24小时饮食回顾访谈。食物称重、图像量化和24小时饮食回顾由三个不同小组的研究人员进行,信息相互隔离。根据分类和总和对食物摄入量进行分析。计算每个受试者餐食中的营养摄入量。将饮食回顾和图像量化获得的数据与实际值进行比较。对重量法与图像量化以及饮食回顾之间的值进行相关性和回归分析。
研究的实验餐食中包括米饭、蔬菜、鱼、肉和豆腐等共23种食物。与24小时饮食回顾数据(r = 0.413,P < 0.05)相比,图像量化估计的食物重量(r = 0.778,P < 0.05,n = 308)与称重数据的相关性更强,且呈现出更集中的线性分布。所有食物图像量化与重量法之间的绝对差异分布为77.23 ± 56.02(P < 0.05,n = 61),远小于24小时回顾与重量法之间的差异(172.77 ± 115.18)。与24小时饮食回顾相比,基于图像量化食物重量计算的几乎所有营养素的值,包括能量、蛋白质、脂肪、碳水化合物、维生素A、维生素C、钙、铁和锌,都更接近称重数据(P < 0.01)。Bland Altman分析结果表明,大多数营养摄入量测量值沿平均差异线分布,且接近平等线(差异 = 0)。这些图表明估计的食物摄入量与实际食物摄入量之间具有相当好的一致性。这表明差异(包括异常值)是随机的,没有表现出任何系统偏差,在不同平均食物量水平上是一致的。另一方面,问卷调查显示,56名孕妇认为图像量化比24小时回顾更省时、负担更小。其中58名孕妇愿意使用图像量化来了解自己的饮食状况。
这种称为即时摄影(图像量化)的新型饮食评估方法比传统的24小时饮食回顾更有效,并且还能获得接近称重数据的食物摄入量值。