Zhuang Yan, Cao Xiaojian
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Feb;29(2):189-93.
To compare the fixation strength of optimum placed pedicle screw (OS) with redirectionally correctly placed pedicle screw (RS) following a violation of lateral pedicle.
Thirty fresh lumbar vertebrae (L1-5) were obtained from 6 pigs weighing 95-105 kg, male or female. Each vertebra was instrumented with a monoaxial pedicle screw into each pedicle using two different techniques. On one side, a perfect screw path was created using direct visualization and fluoroscopy. A pedicle screw of 5 mm in diameter and 35 mm in length was placed with a digital torque driver (OS). On the other side, a lateral pedicle wall violation was created at the pedicle-vertebral body junction with a guide wire, a cannulated tap, and a pedicle probe. This path was then redirected into a correct position, developed, and instrumented with a 5-mm-diameter by 35-mm-long pedicle screw (RS). For each pedicle screw, the maximal torque, seating torque, screw loosening force, and post-loosening axial pullout were measured. Screw loosening and axial pullout were assessed using an MTS machine.
Maximal insertion torque was (111.4 ± 8.2) N x cm and (78.9 ± 6.4) N x cm for OS and RS respectively, showing significant difference (Z = 3.038, P = 0.002). The seating torque was (86.3 ± 7.7) N x cm and (59.7 ± 5.3) N x cm for OS and RS respectively, showing significant difference (Z = 2.802, P = 0.005). The screw loosening force was (76.3 ± 6.2) N and (53.0 ± 5.8) N for OS and RS respectively, showing significant difference (Z = 2.861, P = 0.004). The post-loosening axial pullout force was (343.0 ± 12.6) N and (287.0?10.5) N for OS and RS respectively, showing significant difference (Z = 2.964, P = 0.003).
Compared with OS, RS placement after a lateral wall violation shows significantly decreased maximal insertion torque, seating torque, screw loosening force, and post-loosening axial pullout. On this occasion, RS augmentation is a probable option for remediation.
比较在椎弓根侧壁受损后,最佳置入椎弓根螺钉(OS)与重新定向正确置入椎弓根螺钉(RS)的固定强度。
从6头体重95 - 105千克的猪(雌雄不限)获取30个新鲜腰椎(L1 - 5)。每个椎体使用两种不同技术在每个椎弓根置入一枚单轴椎弓根螺钉。一侧,通过直接可视化和荧光透视创建完美的螺钉置入路径。使用数字扭矩驱动器置入一枚直径5毫米、长度35毫米的椎弓根螺钉(OS)。另一侧,在椎弓根 - 椎体交界处用导丝、空心丝锥和椎弓根探子造成椎弓根侧壁破损。然后将此路径重新定向到正确位置,扩孔并置入一枚直径5毫米、长度35毫米的椎弓根螺钉(RS)。对于每枚椎弓根螺钉,测量最大扭矩、就位扭矩、螺钉松动力和松动后轴向拔出力。使用MTS机器评估螺钉松动和轴向拔出情况。
OS和RS的最大置入扭矩分别为(111.4 ± 8.2)N×cm和(78.9 ± 6.4)N×cm,差异有统计学意义(Z = 3.038,P = 0.002)。OS和RS的就位扭矩分别为(86.3 ± 7.7)N×cm和(59.7 ± 5.3)N×cm,差异有统计学意义(Z = 2.802,P = 0.005)。OS和RS的螺钉松动力分别为(76.3 ± 6.2)N和(53.0 ± 5.8)N,差异有统计学意义(Z = 2.861,P = 0.004)。OS和RS的松动后轴向拔出力分别为(343.0 ± 12.6)N和(287.0 ± 10.5)N,差异有统计学意义(Z = 2.964,P = 0.003)。
与OS相比,侧壁受损后置入RS显示最大置入扭矩、就位扭矩、螺钉松动力和松动后轴向拔出力显著降低。在这种情况下,RS增强术可能是一种补救选择。