Phinyomark Angkoon, Osis Sean, Hettinga Blayne A, Ferber Reed
Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Running Injury Clinic, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
J Biomech. 2015 Nov 5;48(14):3897-904. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.09.025. Epub 2015 Oct 3.
Previous studies have demonstrated distinct clusters of gait patterns in both healthy and pathological groups, suggesting that different movement strategies may be represented. However, these studies have used discrete time point variables and usually focused on only one specific joint and plane of motion. Therefore, the first purpose of this study was to determine if running gait patterns for healthy subjects could be classified into homogeneous subgroups using three-dimensional kinematic data from the ankle, knee, and hip joints. The second purpose was to identify differences in joint kinematics between these groups. The third purpose was to investigate the practical implications of clustering healthy subjects by comparing these kinematics with runners experiencing patellofemoral pain (PFP). A principal component analysis (PCA) was used to reduce the dimensionality of the entire gait waveform data and then a hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) determined group sets of similar gait patterns and homogeneous clusters. The results show two distinct running gait patterns were found with the main between-group differences occurring in frontal and sagittal plane knee angles (P<0.001), independent of age, height, weight, and running speed. When these two groups were compared to PFP runners, one cluster exhibited greater while the other exhibited reduced peak knee abduction angles (P<0.05). The variability observed in running patterns across this sample could be the result of different gait strategies. These results suggest care must be taken when selecting samples of subjects in order to investigate the pathomechanics of injured runners.
先前的研究已经证明,在健康组和病理组中都存在不同的步态模式簇,这表明可能存在不同的运动策略。然而,这些研究使用的是离散时间点变量,并且通常只关注一个特定的关节和运动平面。因此,本研究的第一个目的是确定能否使用来自踝关节、膝关节和髋关节的三维运动学数据,将健康受试者的跑步步态模式分类为同质亚组。第二个目的是识别这些组之间关节运动学的差异。第三个目的是通过将这些运动学数据与患有髌股疼痛(PFP)的跑步者进行比较,研究对健康受试者进行聚类的实际意义。使用主成分分析(PCA)来降低整个步态波形数据的维度,然后通过层次聚类分析(HCA)确定相似步态模式和同质簇的组集。结果显示,发现了两种不同的跑步步态模式,组间主要差异出现在额状面和矢状面的膝关节角度(P<0.001),且与年龄、身高、体重和跑步速度无关。当将这两组与患有PFP的跑步者进行比较时,一组表现出更大的,而另一组表现出更小的膝关节外展峰值角度(P<0.05)。在这个样本中观察到的跑步模式变化可能是不同步态策略的结果。这些结果表明,在选择受试者样本以研究受伤跑步者的病理力学时必须谨慎。