Shimbo Daichi, Abdalla Marwah, Falzon Louise, Townsend Raymond R, Muntner Paul
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Nov 3;163(9):691-700. doi: 10.7326/M15-1270. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
Hypertension, a common risk factor for cardiovascular disease, is usually diagnosed and treated based on blood pressure readings obtained in the clinic setting. Blood pressure may differ considerably when measured inside versus outside of the clinic setting. Over the past several decades, evidence has accumulated on the following 2 approaches for measuring blood pressure outside of the clinic: ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM). Both of these methods have a stronger association with cardiovascular disease outcomes than clinic blood pressure measurement. Controversy exists about whether ABPM or HBPM is superior for estimating risk for cardiovascular disease and under what circumstances these methods should be used in clinical practice for assessing blood pressure outside of the clinic. This review describes ABPM and HBPM procedures, the blood pressure phenotypic measurements that can be ascertained, and the evidence that supports the use of each approach to measuring blood pressure outside of the clinic. It also describes barriers to the successful implementation of ABPM and HBPM in clinical practice, proposes core competencies for the conduct of these procedures, and highlights important areas for future research.
高血压是心血管疾病的常见危险因素,通常依据在临床环境中测得的血压读数进行诊断和治疗。在诊所内与诊所外测量时,血压可能存在显著差异。在过去几十年中,关于在诊所外测量血压的以下两种方法已有大量证据积累:动态血压监测(ABPM)和家庭血压监测(HBPM)。这两种方法与心血管疾病结局的关联均比诊所血压测量更强。对于ABPM或HBPM在评估心血管疾病风险方面哪种更具优势,以及在何种情况下应在临床实践中使用这些方法来评估诊所外血压,存在争议。本综述描述了ABPM和HBPM的程序、可确定的血压表型测量方法,以及支持在诊所外使用每种血压测量方法的证据。它还描述了在临床实践中成功实施ABPM和HBPM所面临的障碍,提出了进行这些程序所需的核心能力,并突出了未来研究的重要领域。