Suppr超能文献

布地奈德通过压力定量吸入器给药治疗儿童哮喘的疗效与安全性。

Efficacy and safety of budesonide administered by pressurized metered-dose inhaler in children with asthma.

作者信息

Meltzer Eli O, Pearlman David S, Eckerwall Gӧran, Uryniak Tom, DePietro Michael, Lampl Kathy

机构信息

Allergy and Asthma Medical Group and Research Center, San Diego, California.

Colorado Allergy & Asthma Centers, Denver, Colorado.

出版信息

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015 Dec;115(6):516-22. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Oct 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Budesonide is approved for delivery using a nebulized solution and dry-powder inhaler, but its use through a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) in pediatric patients with asthma has not been determined.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the efficacy and safety of 160 μg twice daily of budesonide through a pMDI vs placebo in children 6 to younger than 12 years with asthma and a demonstrated need for inhaled corticosteroids.

METHODS

A 6-week, international, multicenter, double-blinded, parallel-group, phase 2 study randomized 304 pediatric patients (mean age, 9 years; 21.7% <8 years) 1:1 to 160 μg (80 μg × 2 inhalations) twice daily of budesonide through a pMDI or placebo after a 7- to 21-day run-in period. The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF); safety end points included adverse events, vital signs, and discontinuations.

RESULTS

Budesonide treatment significantly improved morning PEF vs placebo; mean treatment effect (budesonide vs placebo) was 13.6 L/min (P < .0001). Budesonide also showed significant improvements vs placebo for forced expiratory volume in 1 second, evening PEF, forced expiratory flow at 25% to 75% of pulmonary volume, reliever medication use, nighttime awakenings, awakenings with reliever use, and percentage of patients with at least 15- and at least 30-L/min increase in morning PEF from baseline. The numbers of patients experiencing adverse events and discontinuations were smaller in the budesonide than in the placebo group. No serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Budesonide at 160 μg twice daily through a pMDI was generally well tolerated and significantly improved lung function, symptoms, rescue medication use, and nighttime awakenings vs placebo in children 6 to younger than 12 years with asthma and a demonstrated need for inhaled corticosteroids.

摘要

背景

布地奈德已获批通过雾化溶液和干粉吸入器给药,但尚未确定其在哮喘儿科患者中通过压力定量吸入器(pMDI)的使用情况。

目的

研究在6至12岁以下有哮喘且确需吸入糖皮质激素的儿童中,通过pMDI每日两次使用160μg布地奈德对比安慰剂的疗效和安全性。

方法

一项为期6周的国际多中心双盲平行组2期研究,在7至21天的导入期后,将304名儿科患者(平均年龄9岁;21.7%<8岁)按1:1随机分为两组,分别通过pMDI每日两次使用160μg(80μg×2吸)布地奈德或安慰剂。主要疗效终点是早晨呼气峰值流速(PEF)相对于基线的变化量;安全性终点包括不良事件、生命体征和停药情况。

结果

与安慰剂相比,布地奈德治疗显著改善了早晨PEF;平均治疗效果(布地奈德对比安慰剂)为13.6L/分钟(P<0.0001)。与安慰剂相比,布地奈德在1秒用力呼气容积、夜间PEF、肺容积25%至75%时的用力呼气流量、缓解药物使用、夜间觉醒、使用缓解药物后的觉醒以及早晨PEF相对于基线至少增加15L/分钟和至少增加30L/分钟的患者百分比方面也有显著改善。布地奈德组发生不良事件和停药的患者数量比安慰剂组少。未报告严重不良事件。

结论

对于6至12岁以下有哮喘且确需吸入糖皮质激素的儿童,通过pMDI每日两次使用160μg布地奈德,总体耐受性良好,与安慰剂相比,显著改善了肺功能、症状、急救药物使用和夜间觉醒情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验