Rodriguez-Martinez Nestor G, Safavi-Abbasi Sam, Perez-Orribo Luis, Newcomb Anna G U S, Reyes Phillip M, Loughran Galyna, Theodore Nicholas, Crawford Neil R
Spinal Biomechanics, Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona; and.
Zimmer Spine, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Feb;24(2):340-346. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.SPINE14999. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
OBJECT The Universal Clamp Spinal Fixation System (UC) is a novel sublaminar connection for the spine that is currently used in conjunction with pedicle screws at the thoracic levels for the correction of scoliosis. This device allows the surgeon to attach rods and incorporate a pedicle screw construction. The flexible composition of the UC should provide flexibility intermediate to the uninstrumented spine and an all-screw construct. This hypothesis was tested in vitro using nondestructive flexibility testing of human cadaveric spine segments. METHODS Six unembalmed human cadaveric thoracic spine segments from T-3 to T-11 were used. The specimens were tested under the following conditions: 1) intact; 2) after bilateral screws were placed at T4-T10 and interconnected with longitudinal rods; 3) after placement of a hybrid construction with screws at T-4, T-7, and T-10 with an interconnecting rod on one side and screws at T-4 and T-10 with the UC at T5-9 on the contralateral side; (4) after bilateral screws were placed at T-4 and T-10 and interconnected with rods and bilateral UC were placed at T5-9; and 5) after bilateral screws at T-4 and T-10 were placed and interconnected with rods and bilateral sublaminar cables were placed at T5-9. Pure moments of 6.0 Nm were applied while optoelectronically recording 3D angular motion. RESULTS Bilateral UC placement and bilateral sublaminar cables both resulted in a significantly greater range of motion than bilateral pedicle screws during lateral bending and axial rotation, but not during flexion or extension. There were no differences in stability between bilateral UC and bilateral cables. The construct with limited screws on one side and UC contralaterally showed comparable stability to bilateral UC and bilateral cables. CONCLUSIONS These results support using the UC as a therapeutic option for spinal stabilization because it allows comparable stability to the sublaminar cables and provides flexibility intermediate to that of the uninstrumented spine and an all-screw construct. Equivalent stability of the hybrid, bilateral UC, and bilateral cable constructs indicates that 6-level UC provides stability comparable to that of a limited (3-point) pedicle screw-rod construct.
目的 通用夹式脊柱固定系统(UC)是一种新型的脊柱椎板下连接装置,目前在胸椎节段与椎弓根螺钉联合使用以矫正脊柱侧弯。该装置使外科医生能够连接棒并采用椎弓根螺钉结构。UC的柔性组成应在未植入器械的脊柱和全螺钉结构之间提供中等程度的柔韧性。本假设通过对人体尸体脊柱节段进行无损柔韧性测试在体外进行验证。方法 使用6个未防腐处理的人体胸段脊柱节段,从T-3至T-11。标本在以下条件下进行测试:1)完整状态;2)在T4-T10双侧置入螺钉并与纵向棒连接后;3)在T-4、T-7和T-10置入螺钉并在一侧用连接杆连接,对侧在T-4和T-10置入螺钉并在T5-9置入UC的混合结构后;4)在T-4和T-10双侧置入螺钉并与棒连接,在T5-9双侧置入UC后;5)在T-4和T-10双侧置入螺钉并与棒连接,在T5-9双侧置入椎板下缆线后。施加6.0 Nm的纯力矩,同时通过光电记录三维角运动。结果 在侧弯和轴向旋转过程中,双侧置入UC和双侧置入椎板下缆线均比双侧椎弓根螺钉产生显著更大的运动范围,但在屈伸过程中并非如此。双侧UC和双侧缆线在稳定性方面无差异。一侧有限螺钉与对侧UC的结构显示出与双侧UC和双侧缆线相当的稳定性。结论 这些结果支持将UC用作脊柱稳定化的治疗选择,因为它与椎板下缆线具有相当的稳定性,并在未植入器械的脊柱和全螺钉结构之间提供中等程度的柔韧性。混合结构、双侧UC结构和双侧缆线结构的等效稳定性表明,6节段UC提供的稳定性与有限(3点)椎弓根螺钉-棒结构相当。