Mihajlović Aleksandar I, Thamodaran Vasanth, Bruce Alexander W
Laboratory of Developmental Biology &Genetics (LDB&G), Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, 37005 České Budějovice, CZECH REPUBLIC.
Institute of Entomology Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Branišovská 31, 37005 České Budějovice, CZECH REPUBLIC.
Sci Rep. 2015 Oct 13;5:15034. doi: 10.1038/srep15034.
During mouse preimplantation embryo development, three distinct cell lineages are formed, represented by the differentiating trophectoderm (TE), primitive endoderm (PrE) and the pluripotent epiblast (EPI). Classically, lineage derivation has been presented as a two-step process whereby outer TE cells are first segregated from inner-cell mass (ICM), followed by ICM refinement into either the PrE or EPI. As ICM founders can be produced following the fourth or fifth cleavage divisions, their potential to equally contribute to EPI and PrE is contested. Thus, modelling the early sequestration of ICM founders from TE-differentiation after the fourth cleavage division, we examined ICM lineage contribution of varying sized cell clones unable to initiate TE-differentiation. Such TE-inhibited ICM cells do not equally contribute to EPI and PrE and are significantly biased to form EPI. This bias is not caused by enhanced expression of the EPI marker Nanog, nor correlated with reduced apical polarity but associated with reduced expression of PrE-related gene transcripts (Dab2 and Lrp2) and down-regulation of plasma membrane associated Fgfr2. Our results favour a unifying model were the three cell lineages are guided in an integrated, yet flexible, fate decision centred on relative exposure of founder cells to TE-differentiative cues.
在小鼠植入前胚胎发育过程中,会形成三种不同的细胞谱系,分别由分化的滋养外胚层(TE)、原始内胚层(PrE)和多能外胚层(EPI)代表。传统上,谱系分化被描述为一个两步过程,即外层的TE细胞首先从内细胞团(ICM)中分离出来,随后ICM进一步分化为PrE或EPI。由于ICM祖细胞可以在第四次或第五次卵裂后产生,它们对EPI和PrE的同等贡献存在争议。因此,为了模拟第四次卵裂后ICM祖细胞从TE分化中的早期隔离,我们研究了不同大小的无法启动TE分化的细胞克隆对ICM谱系的贡献。这种受TE抑制的ICM细胞对EPI和PrE的贡献并不相同,而是显著偏向于形成EPI。这种偏向并非由EPI标记物Nanog的表达增强引起,也与顶端极性降低无关,而是与PrE相关基因转录本(Dab2和Lrp2)的表达降低以及质膜相关的Fgfr2下调有关。我们的结果支持一个统一的模型,即这三种细胞谱系在一个以祖细胞对TE分化信号的相对暴露为中心的综合但灵活的命运决定中受到引导。