Chen Yingtai, Chu Yunmian, Che Xu, Lan Zhongmin, Zhang Jianwei, Wang Chengfeng
Department of Abdominal Surgery, Cancer Institute & Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Department of Abdominal Surgery, Cancer Institute & Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China; Email:
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2015 Jun;37(6):461-5.
To investigate the value of Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) and a modification of the POSSUM system (P-P0SSUM) scoring system in predicting the surgical operative risk of pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors.
POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems were used to retrospectively evaluate the clinical data of 432 patients with periampullar tumors who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Department of Abdominal Surgery, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 1985 to December 2010. The predictive occurrence of postoperative complications and mortality rate were calculated according to the formula. ROC curve analysis and different group of risk factors were used to determine the discrimination ability of the two score systems, and to determine their predictive efficacy by comparing the actual and predictive complications and mortality rates, using Hosmer-Lemeshow test to determine the goodness of fit of the two scoring systems.
The average physiological score of the 432 patients was 16.1 ± 3.5, and the average surgical severity score was 19.6 ± 2.7. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under ROC curve for mortality predicted by POSSUM and P-POSSUM were 0.893 and 0.888, showing a non-significant difference (P > 0.05) between them. The area under ROC curve for operative complications predicted by POSSUM scoring system was 0.575. The POSSUM score system was most accurate for the prediction of complication rates of 20%-40%, showing the O/E value of 0.81. Compared with the POSSUM score system, P-POSSUM had better ability in the prediction of postoperative mortality, when the predicted value of mortality was greater than 15%, the predictive result was more accurate, and the O/E value was 1.00.
POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring system have good value in predicting the mortality of patients with periampullary tumors undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, but a poorer value of POSSUM score system in prediction of complications. We can establish a more suitable scoring system for pancreaticoduodenectomy by modifying the score constant and weight, to better predict surgical risk and reduce the operative complications and mortality.
探讨生理与手术严重程度评分系统(POSSUM)及改良的POSSUM系统(P-POSSUM)评分系统在预测壶腹周围肿瘤胰十二指肠切除术手术风险中的价值。
采用POSSUM和P-POSSUM评分系统回顾性分析1985年1月至2010年12月在中国医学科学院肿瘤医院腹部外科接受胰十二指肠切除术的432例壶腹周围肿瘤患者的临床资料。根据公式计算术后并发症的预测发生率及死亡率。采用ROC曲线分析及不同组危险因素分析,以确定两种评分系统的辨别能力,并通过比较实际与预测的并发症及死亡率来确定其预测效能,采用Hosmer-Lemeshow检验确定两种评分系统的拟合优度。
432例患者的平均生理评分为16.1±3.5,平均手术严重程度评分为19.6±2.7。ROC曲线分析显示,POSSUM和P-POSSUM预测死亡率的ROC曲线下面积分别为(0.893)和(0.888),两者差异无统计学意义((P>0.05))。POSSUM评分系统预测手术并发症的ROC曲线下面积为(0.575)。POSSUM评分系统对20%-40%并发症发生率的预测最为准确,(O/E)值为(0.81)。与POSSUM评分系统相比,P-POSSUM在预测术后死亡率方面能力更强,当死亡率预测值大于15%时,预测结果更准确,(O/E)值为(1.00)。
POSSUM和P-POSSUM评分系统在预测壶腹周围肿瘤患者胰十二指肠切除术后死亡率方面具有良好价值,但POSSUM评分系统在预测并发症方面价值较差。可通过修改评分常数及权重,建立更适合胰十二指肠切除术的评分系统,以更好地预测手术风险,降低手术并发症及死亡率。