• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Value-oriented citizenship index: New extensions of Kelman and Hamilton's theory to prevent autocracy.

作者信息

Morselli Davide, Passini Stefano

机构信息

University of Lausanne, Swiss National Centre for Competence in Research LIVES, Géopolis Building, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.

University of Bologna, Department of Education "G. M. Bertin", via Filippo Re 6, 40126 Bologna, Italylogna, Italy.

出版信息

Soc Sci Res. 2015 Nov;54:289-302. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.08.006
PMID:26463549
Abstract

In Crimes of obedience, Kelman and Hamilton argue that societies can be protected by the degeneration of authority only when citizenship is based on a strong values orientation. This reference to values may be the weakest point in their theory because they do not explicitly define these values. Nevertheless, their empirical findings suggest that the authors are referring to specific democratic principles and universal values (e.g., equality, fairness, harmlessness). In this article, a composite index known as the value-oriented citizenship (VOC) index is introduced and empirically analysed. The results confirm that the VOC index discriminates between people who relate to authority based on values rather than based on their role or on rules in general. The article discusses the utility of the VOC index to develop Kelman and Hamilton's framework further empirically as well as its implications for the analysis of the relationship between individuals and authority.

摘要

相似文献

1
Value-oriented citizenship index: New extensions of Kelman and Hamilton's theory to prevent autocracy.
Soc Sci Res. 2015 Nov;54:289-302. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
2
Rejection of the status quo: Conspiracy theories and preference for alternative political systems.拒绝现状:阴谋论与对替代政治制度的偏好。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2024 Oct;63(4):2077-2099. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12754. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
3
Hamilton's rule in multi-level selection models.多层次选择模型中的哈迪-温伯格定律。
J Theor Biol. 2012 Apr 21;299:55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.07.014. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
4
Political economy. On the endogeneity of political preferences: evidence from individual experience with democracy.政治经济学。政治偏好的内生性:来自民主个体经验的证据。
Science. 2015 Mar 6;347(6226):1145-8. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa0880.
5
'From Man to Bacteria': W.D. Hamilton, the theory of inclusive fitness, and the post-war social order.《从人类到细菌》:W.D. 汉密尔顿、广义适合度理论与战后社会秩序
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2015 Feb;49:45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2014.12.001. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
6
Dementia and representative democracy: Exploring challenges and implications for democratic citizenship.痴呆症与代议制民主:探索对民主公民身份的挑战及影响
Dementia (London). 2016 May;15(3):330-42. doi: 10.1177/1471301216638998.
7
Challenging Expertise: Paul Feyerabend vs. Harry Collins & Robert Evans on democracy, public participation and scientific authority: Paul Feyerabend vs. Harry Collins & Robert Evans on scientific authority and public participation.挑战专业知识:保罗·费耶阿本德与哈里·柯林斯及罗伯特·埃文斯论民主、公众参与和科学权威:保罗·费耶阿本德与哈里·柯林斯及罗伯特·埃文斯论科学权威与公众参与
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2016 Jun;57:114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
8
Democracy and genetic privacy: the value of bodily integrity.民主与基因隐私:身体完整性的价值。
Med Health Care Philos. 2005;8(1):97-103. doi: 10.1007/s11019-004-4020-z.
9
Bioethics and democracy.生物伦理学与民主。
Centen Rev. 1990 Spring;34(2):207-25.
10
Civic Competence of Youth in Europe: Measuring Cross National Variation Through the Creation of a Composite Indicator.欧洲青年的公民能力:通过构建综合指标衡量跨国差异
Soc Indic Res. 2015;123(2):431-457. doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0746-z. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Promoting or Opposing Social Change: Political Orientations, Moral Convictions and Protest Intentions.促进或反对社会变革:政治取向、道德信念与抗议意图
Eur J Psychol. 2019 Dec 19;15(4):671-688. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v15i4.1693. eCollection 2019 Dec.