Suppr超能文献

口服抗糖尿病药物的使用与脓毒症风险之间的关联:一项巢式病例对照研究。

Association between Use of Oral Anti-Diabetic Drugs and the Risk of Sepsis: A Nested Case-Control Study.

作者信息

Shih Chia-Jen, Wu Yueh-Lin, Chao Pei-Wen, Kuo Shu-Chen, Yang Chih-Yu, Li Szu-Yuan, Ou Shuo-Ming, Chen Yung-Tai

机构信息

School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Yuanshan Branch, Yilan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2015 Oct 14;5:15260. doi: 10.1038/srep15260.

Abstract

Although oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) have been associated with immunomodulation in preclinical studies, little is still known about the association between the use of OADs and the risk of sepsis. Using a cohort of patients, extracted from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, with type 2 diabetes who were newly diagnosed between 2010 and 2012 and treated with OADs, we conducted a nested case-control study involving 43,015 cases (patients who were first hospitalized for sepsis) and 43,015 matched controls. Compared with non-use, metformin use was associated with a decreased risk of developing sepsis (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-0.83, P < 0.001), but meglitinide (adjusted OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.25-1.40, P < 0.001) use was associated with the increased risk of developing sepsis. The risk for development of sepsis was also lower among current (adjusted OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.96) and recent (adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.94) thiazolidinedione users. Current or recent sulfonylurea use and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor use were not significantly associated with the development of sepsis. Our results highlight the need to consider the potential pleiotropic effect of OADs against sepsis in addition to the lowering of blood glucose.

摘要

尽管口服抗糖尿病药物(OADs)在临床前研究中已被证明与免疫调节有关,但关于OADs的使用与败血症风险之间的关联仍知之甚少。我们从台湾国民健康保险研究数据库中提取了一组2010年至2012年间新诊断为2型糖尿病并接受OADs治疗的患者,进行了一项巢式病例对照研究,其中包括43,015例病例(首次因败血症住院的患者)和43,015例匹配对照。与未使用相比,使用二甲双胍与败血症发生风险降低相关(调整后的比值比[OR]为0.80,95%置信区间[CI]为0.77 - 0.83,P < 0.001),但使用格列奈类药物(调整后的OR为1.32,95% CI为1.25 - 1.40,P < 0.001)与败血症发生风险增加相关。当前(调整后的OR为0.87,95% CI为0.78 - 0.96)和近期(调整后的OR为0.83,95% CI为0.73 - 0.94)使用噻唑烷二酮类药物的患者发生败血症的风险也较低。当前或近期使用磺脲类药物和二肽基肽酶 - 4抑制剂与败血症的发生无显著关联。我们的结果强调,除了降低血糖外,还需要考虑OADs对败血症的潜在多效性作用。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Metformin as adjunct antituberculosis therapy.二甲双胍作为辅助抗结核治疗。
Sci Transl Med. 2014 Nov 19;6(263):263ra159. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009885.
7
Diabetes prescribing in England consumes nearly 10% of primary care budget.
BMJ. 2014 Aug 12;349:g5143. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g5143.
8
Use of antidiabetic drugs in the U.S., 2003-2012.美国 2003-2012 年抗糖尿病药物的使用情况。
Diabetes Care. 2014;37(5):1367-74. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2289. Epub 2014 Mar 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验