Jurk Sarah, Kuitunen-Paul Sören, Kroemer Nils B, Artiges Eric, Banaschewski Tobias, Bokde Arun L W, Büchel Christian, Conrod Patricia, Fauth-Bühler Mira, Flor Herta, Frouin Vincent, Gallinat Jürgen, Garavan Hugh, Heinz Andreas, Mann Karl F, Nees Frauke, Paus Tomáš, Pausova Zdenka, Poustka Luise, Rietschel Marcella, Schumann Gunter, Struve Maren, Smolka Michael N
Department of Psychiatry and Neuroimaging Center, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015 Nov;39(11):2234-48. doi: 10.1111/acer.12886. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
The aim of the present longitudinal study was the psychometric evaluation of the Substance Use Risk Profile Scale (SURPS).
We analyzed data from N = 2,022 adolescents aged 13 to 15 at baseline assessment and 2 years later (mean interval 2.11 years). Missing data at follow-up were imputed (N = 522). Psychometric properties of the SURPS were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis. We examined structural as well as convergent validity with other personality measurements and drinking motives, and predictive validity for substance use at follow-up.
The hypothesized 4-factorial structure (i.e., anxiety sensitivity, hopelessness, impulsivity [IMP], and sensation seeking [SS]) based on all 23 items resulted in acceptable fit to empirical data, acceptable internal consistencies, low to moderate test-retest reliability coefficients, as well as evidence for factorial and convergent validity. The proposed factor structure was stable for both males and females and, to lesser degree, across languages. However, only the SS and the IMP subscales of the SURPS predicted substance use outcomes at 16 years of age.
The SURPS is unique in its specific assessment of traits related to substance use disorders as well as the resulting shortened administration time. Test-retest reliability was low to moderate and comparable to other personality scales. However, its relation to future substance use was limited to the SS and IMP subscales, which may be due to the relatively low-risk substance use pattern in the present sample.
本纵向研究的目的是对物质使用风险概况量表（SURPS）进行心理测量学评估。
我们分析了在基线评估时年龄为13至15岁且2年后（平均间隔2.11年）的N = 2022名青少年的数据。对随访时的缺失数据进行了插补（N = 522）。使用验证性因素分析来分析SURPS的心理测量学特性。我们检验了与其他人格测量和饮酒动机相关的结构效度以及收敛效度，以及随访时物质使用的预测效度。
基于所有23个项目的假设4因素结构（即焦虑敏感性、绝望感、冲动性[IMP]和感觉寻求[SS]）与实证数据拟合度可接受，内部一致性可接受，重测信度系数低至中等，并且有因素效度和收敛效度的证据。所提出的因素结构对男性和女性都是稳定的，在较小程度上跨语言也是稳定的。然而，只有SURPS的SS和IMP子量表预测了16岁时的物质使用结果。
SURPS在对与物质使用障碍相关特质的特定评估以及由此缩短的施测时间方面具有独特性。重测信度低至中等，与其他人格量表相当。然而，它与未来物质使用的关系仅限于SS和IMP子量表，这可能是由于本样本中相对低风险的物质使用模式所致。
