• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非重症急性细支气管炎患儿治疗中住院时间与吸入治疗类型的相关性

Duration of Hospitalization in Association with Type of Inhalation Therapy Used in the Management of Children with Nonsevere, Acute Bronchiolitis.

作者信息

Pinto Jamie M, Schairer Janet L, Petrova Anna

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, NJ, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Neonatol. 2016 Apr;57(2):140-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2015.04.014. Epub 2015 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.pedneo.2015.04.014
PMID:26464183
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute bronchiolitis is one of the main respiratory emergencies in young children. Although supportive therapy is recommended, substantial inconsistency in the clinical usage of inhaled treatments has been reported. In the present study, we evaluated the association between different types of nebulized therapies in clinical practice and the length of stay (LOS) of young children hospitalized with nonsevere bronchiolitis.

METHODS

Medical records of 195 patients with bronchiolitis, without evidence of pneumonia or congenital/chronic respiratory conditions, were stratified with respect to the type of inhalation therapy received: nebulized albuterol (Group 1, n = 53), nebulized albuterol with 3% saline (Group 2, n = 38), nebulized 3% saline alone (Group 3, n = 33), or no inhaled treatment (Group 4, n = 71). Duration of hospital stay was reported with respect to the type of inhalation therapy received after controlling for variability in patient age (months), oxygen saturation, respiratory score, and use of other treatments (antibiotics, oxygen supplementation, and/or corticosteroids). LOS is presented in terms of mean and 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

RESULTS

The groups were similar except for differences in the mean level of oxygen saturation, respiratory score, and corticosteroid use. Children in Group 4 had the lowest mean respiratory score due to a lesser prevalence of wheezing and/or retractions than in other groups. The LOS for children in Groups 1 and 4 was shorter (43.2 hours, 95% CI 34.9-51.3, and 44.1 hours, 95% CI 37.3-51.0, respectively) than in Groups 2 and 3 (72 hours, 95% CI 62.1-81.6, and 65.1 hours, 95% CI 54.7-75.6, respectively) (p < 0.02). The mean LOS in each group did not change significantly after adjustment for covariants.

CONCLUSION

Prolonged hospitalization of children younger than 2 years with acute, nonsevere bronchiolitis is associated with administration of nebulized 3% saline, independent of age, clinical presentation of disease, or inclusion of other treatments in their management.

摘要

背景

急性细支气管炎是幼儿主要的呼吸急症之一。尽管推荐采用支持性治疗,但据报道吸入治疗的临床应用存在很大差异。在本研究中,我们评估了临床实践中不同类型的雾化治疗与非重症细支气管炎住院幼儿住院时间(LOS)之间的关联。

方法

195例无肺炎或先天性/慢性呼吸疾病证据的细支气管炎患者的病历,根据接受的吸入治疗类型进行分层:雾化沙丁胺醇(第1组,n = 53)、雾化沙丁胺醇加3%盐水(第2组,n = 38)、单独雾化3%盐水(第3组,n = 33)或未进行吸入治疗(第4组,n = 71)。在控制患者年龄(月)、血氧饱和度、呼吸评分以及其他治疗(抗生素、吸氧和/或皮质类固醇)的变异性后,报告住院时间与接受的吸入治疗类型的关系。LOS以均值和95%置信区间(95%CI)表示。

结果

除血氧饱和度均值水平、呼吸评分和皮质类固醇使用存在差异外,各组相似。第4组儿童的平均呼吸评分最低,因为喘息和/或吸气凹陷的发生率低于其他组。第1组和第4组儿童的LOS(分别为43.2小时,95%CI 34.9 - 51.3,和44.1小时,95%CI 37.3 - 51.0)比第2组和第3组(分别为72小时,95%CI 62.1 - 81.6,和65.1小时,95%CI 54.7 - 75.6)短(p < 0.02)。调整协变量后,每组的平均LOS无显著变化。

结论

2岁以下急性非重症细支气管炎患儿住院时间延长与雾化吸入3%盐水有关,与年龄、疾病临床表现或治疗中是否包含其他治疗无关。

相似文献

1
Duration of Hospitalization in Association with Type of Inhalation Therapy Used in the Management of Children with Nonsevere, Acute Bronchiolitis.非重症急性细支气管炎患儿治疗中住院时间与吸入治疗类型的相关性
Pediatr Neonatol. 2016 Apr;57(2):140-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2015.04.014. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
2
Does nebulized hypertonic saline shorten hospitalization in young children with acute viral wheezing?雾化高渗盐水是否能缩短急性病毒性喘息幼儿的住院时间?
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2018 Feb;53(2):138-144. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23924. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
3
Nebulized hypertonic saline for bronchiolitis: a randomized clinical trial.雾化高渗盐水治疗细支气管炎:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Jul;168(7):657-63. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.301.
4
A randomized trial of nebulized 3% hypertonic saline with salbutamol in the treatment of acute bronchiolitis in hospitalized infants.雾化吸入3%高渗盐水联合沙丁胺醇治疗住院婴儿急性细支气管炎的随机试验
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016 Apr;51(4):418-25. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23306. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
5
Nebulized hypertonic saline/salbutamol solution treatment in hospitalized children with mild to moderate bronchiolitis.雾化吸入高渗盐水/沙丁胺醇溶液治疗住院的轻至中度毛细支气管炎患儿
Pediatr Int. 2010 Apr;52(2):199-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2009.02941.x. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
6
Saline in acute bronchiolitis RCT and economic evaluation: hypertonic saline in acute bronchiolitis - randomised controlled trial and systematic review.急性细支气管炎中生理盐水的随机对照试验及经济学评估:高渗盐水治疗急性细支气管炎——随机对照试验与系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Aug;19(66):1-130. doi: 10.3310/hta19660.
7
Efficacy of Nebulized Hypertonic Saline (3%) Versus Normal Saline and Salbutamol in Treating Acute Bronchiolitis in A Tertiary Hospital: A Randomized Controlled Trial.雾化高渗盐水(3%)与生理盐水和沙丁胺醇治疗三级医院急性细支气管炎的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Mymensingh Med J. 2022 Apr;31(2):295-303.
8
Effect of Nebulized Hypertonic Saline Treatment in Emergency Departments on the Hospitalization Rate for Acute Bronchiolitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.急诊雾化高渗盐水治疗对急性细支气管炎住院率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Aug 7;171(8):e171333. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1333.
9
Does nebulized epinephrine improve the efficacy of hypertonic saline solution in the treatment of hospitalized moderate acute bronchiolitis? A double blind, randomized clinical trial.雾化吸入肾上腺素能否提高高渗盐溶液治疗住院中度急性细支气管炎的疗效?一项双盲随机临床试验。
Minerva Pediatr. 2016 Apr;68(2):81-8. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
10
Nebulized hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants.雾化高渗盐水溶液用于婴儿急性细支气管炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8(4):CD006458. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006458.pub2.