• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[乳腺癌女性身体意象关系量表的效度验证]

[Validation of Body Image Relationship Scale for women with breast cancer].

作者信息

Vieira Elisabeth Meloni, dos Santos Manoel Antônio, Santos Daniela Barsotti, Mancini Marina Pasquali Marconato, de Souza Hayala Cristina Cavenague, Bazan Jorge Luis, Perdoná Gleici Da Silva Castro

机构信息

Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brasil.

Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2015 Oct;37(10):473-9. doi: 10.1590/SO100-720320150005354.

DOI:10.1590/SO100-720320150005354
PMID:26465166
Abstract

PURPOSE

To validate the instrument Body Image Relationship Scale (BIRS) for Brazilian women with breast cancer.

METHODS

The instrument was administered by trained interviewers to 139 women who used the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS). All of them had been submitted to cancer treatments between 2006 and 2010. The instrument was validated considering internal consistency and reliability. In order to compare the techniques, the same factorial analysis as used in the original paper was carried out.

RESULTS

The Spearman-Brown correlation value was 0.8, indicating high internal reliability. The Cronbach's alpha found was 0.9, indicating a high level of internal consistency. Factorial analysis showed that four items had low factorial load and no discriminatory power, and another five items were relocated to other factors. When the instrument was applied, it showed variability to that of the original instrument.

CONCLUSION

The Brazilian version of the Body Image Relationship Scale (BIRS), named Escala de Relacionamento e Imagem Corporal (ERIC), showed evidence of adequate reliability and internal consistency, making this instrument suitable to be recommended for application to Brazilian women with breast cancer, despite some limitations.

摘要

目的

验证适用于巴西乳腺癌女性的身体意象关系量表(BIRS)。

方法

由经过培训的访谈者对139名使用巴西统一卫生系统(SUS)的女性进行该量表测试。她们均在2006年至2010年间接受过癌症治疗。从内部一致性和可靠性方面对该量表进行验证。为比较技术方法,进行了与原文相同的因子分析。

结果

斯皮尔曼-布朗相关值为0.8,表明内部可靠性高。克朗巴哈系数为0.9,表明内部一致性水平高。因子分析显示,有4个项目的因子载荷低且无区分能力,另外5个项目被重新归类到其他因子。该量表应用时,与原量表相比存在差异。

结论

巴西版身体意象关系量表(BIRS),即身体关系与意象量表(ERIC),显示出足够的可靠性和内部一致性,尽管存在一些局限性,但该量表仍适合推荐用于巴西乳腺癌女性。

相似文献

1
[Validation of Body Image Relationship Scale for women with breast cancer].[乳腺癌女性身体意象关系量表的效度验证]
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2015 Oct;37(10):473-9. doi: 10.1590/SO100-720320150005354.
2
Validation of the Adherence Determinants Questionnaire scale among women with breast and cervical cancer.乳腺癌和宫颈癌女性患者依从性决定因素问卷量表的验证
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2015 Sep-Oct;23(5):971-8. doi: 10.1590/0104-1169.0222.2638.
3
[French validation of the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale-VSSS-54F].[《维罗纳服务满意度量表 - VSSS - 54F》的法语验证]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):110-8.
4
[Adaptation and validation of the CCAENA(©) scale for the measurement of continuity of care between healthcare levels in Colombia and Brazil].[CCAENA(©)量表在哥伦比亚和巴西医疗保健层级间医疗连续性测量中的适用性与验证]
Gac Sanit. 2015 Mar-Apr;29(2):88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2014.10.009. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
5
Development and validation of the body image scale among Thai breast cancer patients.泰国乳腺癌患者身体意象量表的编制与验证
J Med Assoc Thai. 2013 Jan;96 Suppl 1:S30-9.
6
Psychometric evaluation of Self-Assessed Support Needs of women with breast cancer Scale.乳腺癌患者自我评估支持需求量表的心理测量学评价
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Oct;16(10):1927-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01825.x.
7
Adaptation of the Sexual Adjustment and Body Image Scale in Turkish Breast Cancer Women.
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2016 Jul;27(3):162-9. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12087. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
8
Measuring reliability and validity of a newly developed stress instrument: Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Stress Scale.测量新开发的压力工具的可靠性和有效性:新诊断乳腺癌压力量表。
J Clin Nurs. 2013 Sep;22(17-18):2417-25. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12107. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
9
[Factorial analysis and internal consistency of the French version of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS 20), in obese women].[肥胖女性中多伦多述情障碍量表(TAS 20)法语版的因子分析与内部一致性]
Encephale. 2002 Jul-Aug;28(4):277-82.
10
The body image and relationships scale: development and validation of a measure of body image in female breast cancer survivors.身体意象与人际关系量表:女性乳腺癌幸存者身体意象测量工具的开发与验证
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 10;26(8):1269-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.2661.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between Body Image and Quality of Life of Women Who Underwent Breast Cancer Surgery.接受乳腺癌手术女性的身体意象与生活质量之间的关联
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jul 15;22(7):1114. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22071114.
2
Body image assessment in oncology: an update review.肿瘤学中的身体形象评估:最新综述。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Mar;25(3):1019-1029. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3538-y. Epub 2016 Dec 17.