Chouhan Arun, Abhyankar Amit, Basu Sandip
Radiation Medicine Centre, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Tata Memorial Hospital Annexe, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Nucl Med Commun. 2016 Jan;37(1):74-8. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000414.
Radioactive iodine (I) (RAI) is used widely for the treatment of hyperthyroidism either as a first-line treatment or following relapse after antithyroid drug treatment. Intrathyroidal retention of RAI is considered an important determinant of its effectiveness, which is believed to be prolonged by lithium.
To study the impact of low-dose oral lithium therapy on RAI uptake and retention parameters in different subgroups of hyperthyroidism patients, and thus explore its potential role in enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of RAI in these groups of patients.
A total of 28 patients (age range=18-70 years) who were being considered for RAI therapy were included in this prospective pilot study. The patients were divided into two groups: (i) those who had not received any RAI therapy before were included in 'group I' (n=22), whereas (ii) 'group II' (n=6) included patients who were found to be persistently hyperthyroid on biochemical and clinical follow-up despite previous RAI therapy for hyperthyroidism. Patients in group I were further divided into four subgroups on the basis of the underlying etiopathology: (a) subgroup Ia - diffuse toxic goiter (n=15), (b) subgroup Ib - autonomous functioning module (n=2), (c) subgroup Ic - toxic multinodular goiter (n=4), and (d) subgroup Id - nontoxic multinodular goiter (n=1) on the basis of scintigraphic and clinical findings. All patients first underwent 25 μCi I uptake estimation at 2, 24, and 48 h and values thus obtained were considered the baseline for further evaluation. After biochemical assessment of normal renal and liver functions, patients received 900 mg lithium per day in three divided doses orally, and on the fourth day after starting tab lithium, the serum lithium level was estimated with continued lithium administration. On the fifth, sixth, and seventh day, patients underwent lithium-primed 25 μCi I uptake estimation at 2, 24, and 48 h. Retention index (RI) was calculated using the formula [RI=(48 h uptake-24 h uptake)/24 h uptake×100]. A day after completion of uptake study, that is, on the third day from diagnostic (25 μCi I) RAI administration, patients received a fixed 5 mCi therapeutic RAI dose after their suitability for the same was ascertained using clinical, biochemical, and scintigraphic findings as the criteria. Lithium administration was stopped 5 days after therapy.
Lithium priming resulted in a significantly reduced serum FT4 level in subgroup Ia (diffuse goiter) of group I. Similarly, lithium priming resulted in a statistically significant increase in the radioiodine RI in subgroup Ia. Lithium priming resulted in increased retention of radioiodine and reduced serum FT4 level in the rest of the study population also, but the difference was not statistically significant (likely because of fewer patients in these subgroups). The low-dose lithium priming regimen used in the present study was found to be feasible and safe. The mean serum lithium concentration was 0.6 mEq/l with the dose protocol administered and hence was considered safe. Only one patient had achieved a level of 1.5 mEq/l, without any obvious side effects, and it was clinically uneventful. One patient experienced headache necessitating dose reduction.
The results of this study, carried out in different groups of patients with hyperthyroidism, suggested that a short course of lithium is safe and could be beneficial for hyperthyroid patients considered for RAI therapy as it increased the RAI retention in thyroid, and thus had the potential to increase the effect of RAI therapy. Alternatively, it is proposed that lithium priming could help reduce the dose of RAI administered without compromising on therapeutic efficacy, with possible potential implications for cost reduction, radiation safety precautions, and lowered radiation dose to nontarget organs.
放射性碘(I)(RAI)广泛用于治疗甲状腺功能亢进症,可作为一线治疗方法,也可用于抗甲状腺药物治疗后复发的情况。甲状腺内放射性碘的潴留被认为是其有效性的重要决定因素,据信锂可延长其潴留时间。
研究低剂量口服锂疗法对不同亚组甲状腺功能亢进症患者放射性碘摄取和潴留参数的影响,从而探讨其在增强这些患者群体中放射性碘治疗效果方面的潜在作用。
本前瞻性初步研究纳入了总共28例(年龄范围为18 - 70岁)正在考虑接受放射性碘治疗的患者。患者分为两组:(i)之前未接受过任何放射性碘治疗的患者纳入“I组”(n = 22),而(ii)“II组”(n = 6)包括尽管之前接受过放射性碘治疗甲状腺功能亢进症,但在生化和临床随访中仍持续甲状腺功能亢进的患者。I组患者根据潜在病因进一步分为四个亚组:(a)Ia亚组 - 弥漫性毒性甲状腺肿(n = 15),(b)Ib亚组 - 自主功能结节(n = 2),(c)Ic亚组 - 毒性多结节性甲状腺肿(n = 4),以及(d)Id亚组 - 根据闪烁扫描和临床检查结果为非毒性多结节性甲状腺肿(n = 1)。所有患者首先在2、24和48小时进行25μCi碘摄取量估计,所得值被视为进一步评估的基线。在对肾功能和肝功能进行生化评估正常后,患者每天口服900mg锂,分三次服用,在开始服用锂片后的第四天,估计血清锂水平并继续服用锂。在第五、第六和第七天,患者在2、24和48小时进行锂激发后的25μCi碘摄取量估计。使用公式[潴留指数(RI)=(48小时摄取量 - 24小时摄取量)/ 24小时摄取量×100]计算潴留指数。在摄取研究完成后的一天,即从诊断性(25μCi碘)放射性碘给药后的第三天,在根据临床、生化和闪烁扫描结果确定患者适合后,给予固定的5mCi治疗性放射性碘剂量。治疗后5天停止服用锂。
锂激发导致I组Ia亚组(弥漫性甲状腺肿)的血清游离甲状腺素(FT4)水平显著降低。同样,锂激发导致Ia亚组的放射性碘潴留指数有统计学意义的增加。锂激发在其余研究人群中也导致放射性碘潴留增加和血清FT4水平降低,但差异无统计学意义(可能是因为这些亚组中的患者较少)。本研究中使用的低剂量锂激发方案被认为是可行且安全的。按照给药方案,平均血清锂浓度为0.6mEq / l,因此被认为是安全的。只有一名患者达到了1.5mEq / l的水平,没有任何明显的副作用,临床过程平稳。一名患者出现头痛,需要减少剂量。
在不同组甲状腺功能亢进症患者中进行的这项研究结果表明,短期服用锂是安全的,对于考虑接受放射性碘治疗的甲状腺功能亢进症患者可能有益,因为它增加了甲状腺对放射性碘的潴留,从而有可能增加放射性碘治疗的效果。或者,有人提出锂激发有助于在不影响治疗效果的情况下减少放射性碘的给药剂量,这可能对降低成本、辐射安全预防措施以及减少对非靶器官的辐射剂量具有潜在意义。