Suppr超能文献

通过剪切波弹性成像测量的病变硬度:超声引导下乳腺粗针穿刺活检组织学低估的术前预测指标。

Lesion stiffness measured by shear-wave elastography: Preoperative predictor of the histologic underestimation of US-guided core needle breast biopsy.

作者信息

Park Ah Young, Son Eun Ju, Kim Jeong-Ah, Han Kyunghwa, Youk Ji Hyun

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 123 Jeokgeum-ro, Danwon-gu, Ansan city, Gyeonggi-do 15355, Republic of Korea; Kangwon National University Graduate School, 1 Kangwondaehak-gil, Chuncheon-si, Gangwon-do 24341, Republic of Korea.

Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonju-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06273, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2015 Dec;84(12):2509-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Oct 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether lesion stiffness measured by shear-wave elastography (SWE) can be used to predict the histologic underestimation of ultrasound (US)-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy (CNB) for breast masses.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 99 breast masses from 93 patients, including 40 high-risk lesions and 59 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), which were diagnosed by US-guided 14-gauge CNB. SWE was performed for all breast masses to measure quantitative elasticity values before US-guided CNB. To identify the preoperative factors associated with histologic underestimation, patients' age, symptoms, lesion size, B-mode US findings, and quantitative SWE parameters were compared according to the histologic upgrade after surgery using the chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, or independent t-test. The independent factors for predicting histologic upgrade were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The underestimation rate was 28.3% (28/99) in total, 25.0% (10/40) in high-risk lesions, and 30.5% (18/59) in DCIS. All elasticity values of the upgrade group were significantly higher than those of the non-upgrade group (P<0.001). On multivariate analysis, the mean (Odds ratio [OR]=1.021, P=0.001), maximum (OR=1.015, P=0.008), and minimum (OR=1.028, P=0.001) elasticity values were independently associated with histologic underestimation. The patients' age, lesion size, and final assessment category on US of the upgrade group were higher than those of the non-upgrade group (P=0.046 for age; P=0.021 for lesion size; P=0.030 for US category), but these were not independent predictors of histologic underestimation on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Breast lesion stiffness quantitatively measured by SWE could be helpful to predict the underestimation of malignancy in US-guided 14-gauge CNB.

摘要

目的

确定通过剪切波弹性成像(SWE)测量的病变硬度是否可用于预测超声(US)引导下14G粗针穿刺活检(CNB)对乳腺肿块组织学低估情况。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了93例患者的99个乳腺肿块,其中包括40个高危病变和59个导管原位癌(DCIS),均通过US引导下14G CNB诊断。在US引导下CNB之前,对所有乳腺肿块进行SWE以测量定量弹性值。为了确定与组织学低估相关的术前因素,使用卡方检验、Fisher精确检验或独立t检验,根据术后组织学升级情况比较患者的年龄、症状、病变大小、B超检查结果和定量SWE参数。使用多因素逻辑回归分析评估预测组织学升级的独立因素。

结果

总体低估率为28.3%(28/99),高危病变为25.0%(10/40),DCIS为30.5%(18/59)。升级组的所有弹性值均显著高于未升级组(P<0.001)。多因素分析显示,平均弹性值(比值比[OR]=1.021,P=0.001)、最大弹性值(OR=1.015,P=0.008)和最小弹性值(OR=1.028,P=0.001)与组织学低估独立相关。升级组患者的年龄、病变大小和US最终评估类别高于未升级组(年龄P=0.046;病变大小P=0.021;US类别P=0.030),但在多因素分析中这些并非组织学低估的独立预测因素。

结论

通过SWE定量测量的乳腺病变硬度可能有助于预测US引导下14G CNB对恶性肿瘤的低估情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验