The University of Sydney, Australia
University of Canberra, Australia.
Public Underst Sci. 2016 Jan;25(1):104-16. doi: 10.1177/0963662515609005. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
In this article, we sketch a 'manifesto' for the 'public understanding of big data'. On the one hand, this entails such public understanding of science and public engagement with science and technology-tinged questions as follows: How, when and where are people exposed to, or do they engage with, big data? Who are regarded as big data's trustworthy sources, or credible commentators and critics? What are the mechanisms by which big data systems are opened to public scrutiny? On the other hand, big data generate many challenges for public understanding of science and public engagement with science and technology: How do we address publics that are simultaneously the informant, the informed and the information of big data? What counts as understanding of, or engagement with, big data, when big data themselves are multiplying, fluid and recursive? As part of our manifesto, we propose a range of empirical, conceptual and methodological exhortations. We also provide Appendix 1 that outlines three novel methods for addressing some of the issues raised in the article.
在本文中,我们勾勒了一个“大数据公众理解”的宣言。一方面,这需要对以下科学和科技相关的公众理解和公众参与问题进行探讨:人们在何时何地接触或参与大数据?谁被视为大数据的可信赖来源或可信的评论员和批评者?大数据系统的哪些机制可以向公众审查开放?另一方面,大数据给科学的公众理解和公众参与带来了许多挑战:我们如何应对既是信息提供者、知情者又是大数据信息本身的公众?当大数据本身在不断增加、变化和递归时,什么才算是对大数据的理解或参与?作为我们宣言的一部分,我们提出了一系列经验、概念和方法方面的建议。我们还在附录 1 中概述了三种新方法,用于解决本文中提出的一些问题。