Grimsrud Anna, Lesosky Maia, Kalombo Cathy, Bekker Linda-Gail, Myer Landon
*Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa;†Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa;‡Gugulethu Community Health Centre, Provincial Government of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa; and§The Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016 Jan 1;71(1):e16-23. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000863.
Community-based models of antiretroviral therapy (ART) delivery are widely discussed as a priority in the expansion of HIV treatment services, but data on their effectiveness are limited. We examined outcomes of ART patients decentralized to community-based adherence clubs (CACs) in Cape Town, South Africa and compared these to patients managed in the community health center.
The analysis included 8150 adults initiating ART from 2002 to 2012 in a public sector service followed until the end of 2013. From June 2012, stable patients (on ART >12 months, suppressed viral load) were referred to CACs. Loss to follow-up (LTFU) was compared between services using proportional hazards models with time-varying covariates and inverse probability weights of CAC participation.
Of the 2113 CAC patients (71% female, 7% youth ages ≤ 24 years), 94% were retained on ART after 12 months. Among CAC patients, LTFU [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 2.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.26 to 3.73 ] and viral rebound (aHR 2.24, 95% CI: 1.00 to 5.04) were twice as likely in youth (16-24 years old) compared with older patients, but no difference in the risk of LTFU or viral rebound was observed by sex (P-values 0.613 and 0.278, respectively). CAC participation was associated with a 67% reduction in the risk of LTFU (aHR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.40) compared with community health centre, and this association persisted when stratified by patient demographic and clinic characteristics.
CACs are associated with reduced risk of LTFU compared with facility-based care. Community-based models represent an important development to facilitate ART delivery and possibly improve patient outcomes.
基于社区的抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)模式作为扩大艾滋病毒治疗服务的优先事项被广泛讨论,但关于其有效性的数据有限。我们研究了南非开普敦分散到基于社区的依从性俱乐部(CACs)的ART患者的结局,并将这些结果与在社区卫生中心接受管理的患者进行比较。
分析纳入了2002年至2012年在公共部门服务中开始接受ART治疗并随访至2013年底的8150名成年人。从2012年6月起,病情稳定的患者(接受ART治疗超过12个月,病毒载量得到抑制)被转介到CACs。使用具有随时间变化的协变量和CAC参与的逆概率权重的比例风险模型比较各服务之间的失访(LTFU)情况。
在2113名CAC患者中(71%为女性,7%为年龄≤24岁的青年),94%在12个月后继续接受ART治疗。在CAC患者中,与老年患者相比,青年(16 - 24岁)的失访风险[调整后风险比(aHR):2.17,95%置信区间(CI):1.26至3.73]和病毒反弹风险(aHR 2.24,95% CI:1.00至5.04)高出两倍,但按性别观察到的失访风险或病毒反弹风险无差异(P值分别为0.613和0.278)。与社区卫生中心相比,参与CAC与失访风险降低67%相关(aHR:0.33,95% CI:0.27至0.40),并且当按患者人口统计学和诊所特征分层时,这种关联仍然存在。
与基于机构的护理相比,CACs与降低失访风险相关。基于社区的模式是促进ART提供并可能改善患者结局的一项重要进展。