Suppr超能文献

贝伐珠单抗联合或不联合厄洛替尼作为转移性结直肠癌(GERCOR DREAM;OPTIMOX3)患者的维持治疗:一项随机、开放标签、3 期临床试验。

Bevacizumab with or without erlotinib as maintenance therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (GERCOR DREAM; OPTIMOX3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

机构信息

Hôpital Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris-Est Créteil University, Créteil, France.

Institut Hospitalier Franco-Britannique, Levallois-Perret, France.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2015 Nov;16(15):1493-1505. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00216-8. Epub 2015 Oct 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The combination of an anti-VEGF or an anti-EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibody with chemotherapy has shown clinical activity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. However, combining both anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR antibodies with chemotherapy in first-line treatment resulted in adverse outcomes. We assessed whether the combination of erlotinib, an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, with bevacizumab could increase the efficacy of maintenance therapy in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer.

METHODS

This randomised, open-label, phase 3 study was undertaken in 49 centres in France, Austria, and Canada. Eligible patients were aged 18-80 years with histologically confirmed, unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer, WHO performance status 0-2, had received no previous therapy for metastatic disease, and had adequate organ function. Patients without disease progression after bevacizumab-based induction therapy were randomly assigned (1:1) by a minimisation technique to bevacizumab (7·5 mg/kg every 3 weeks) or bevacizumab plus erlotinib (150 mg once daily) as maintenance therapy until progression. All patients were stratified by centre, baseline performance status, age, and number of metastatic sites. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival on maintenance therapy analysed by intention to treat. We report the final analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00265824.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 1, 2007, and Oct 13, 2011, 700 eligible patients were enrolled; following induction treatment, patients without disease progression were randomly assigned to bevacizumab (n=228) or bevacizumab plus erlotinib (n=224). At the final analysis, median follow-up was 51·0 months (IQR 36·0-60·0) in the bevacizumab group and 48·3 months (31·5-61·0) in the bevacizumab plus erlotinib group. In the primary analysis (after 231 progression-free survival events), median progression-free survival from randomisation was 5·1 months (95% CI 4·1-5·9) in the bevacizumab plus erlotinib group compared with 6·0 months (4·6-7·9) in the bevacizumab group (stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0·79 [95% CI 0·60-1·06]; p=0·11; unstratified HR 0·76 [0·59-0·99]; p=0·043). In the final analysis, median progression-free survival from randomisation was 5·4 months (95% CI 4·3-6·2) in the bevacizumab plus erlotinib group compared with 4·9 months (4·1-5·7) in the bevacizumab group (stratified HR 0·81 [95% CI 0·66-1·01], p=0·059; unstratified HR 0·78 [0·68-0·96], p=0·019). At the final analysis, median overall survival from maintenance was 24·9 months (95% CI 21·4-28·9) in the bevacizumab plus erlotinib group and 22·1 months (19·6-26·7) in the bevacizumab group (stratified HR 0·79 [95% CI 0·63-0·99], p=0·036; unstratified HR 0·79 [0·64-0·98], p=0·035). The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events were skin rash (47 [21%] of 220 patients in the bevacizumab plus erlotinib group vs none of 224 patients in the bevacizumab alone group), diarrhoea (21 [10%] vs two [<1%]), and asthenia (12 [5%] vs two [<1%]).

INTERPRETATION

Maintenance bevacizumab plus erlotinib might be a new non-chemotherapy-based maintenance option for the first-line treatment of patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer after bevacizumab-based induction therapy.

FUNDING

GERCOR and F Hoffmann-La Roche.

摘要

背景

抗 VEGF 或抗 EGFR 靶向单克隆抗体与化疗联合应用于转移性结直肠癌患者,已显示出临床活性。然而,在一线治疗中同时使用抗 VEGF 和抗 EGFR 抗体与化疗联合应用,导致了不良结局。我们评估了表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂厄洛替尼与贝伐珠单抗联合应用能否增加不可切除转移性结直肠癌维持治疗的疗效。

方法

这是一项在法国、奥地利和加拿大的 49 个中心进行的随机、开放标签、3 期研究。纳入的患者年龄为 18-80 岁,组织学证实为不可切除的转移性结直肠癌,世界卫生组织表现状态 0-2 分,先前未接受过转移性疾病的治疗,且器官功能良好。在贝伐珠单抗诱导治疗后无疾病进展的患者,通过最小化技术以 1:1 的比例随机分配至贝伐珠单抗(7.5mg/kg,每 3 周 1 次)或贝伐珠单抗加厄洛替尼(150mg,每日 1 次)作为维持治疗,直至疾病进展。所有患者按中心、基线表现状态、年龄和转移性部位进行分层。主要终点是维持治疗的无进展生存期,分析方法为意向治疗。我们报告最终分析结果。本试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT00265824。

结果

在 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2011 年 10 月 13 日期间,共纳入 700 名符合条件的患者。在诱导治疗后,无疾病进展的患者被随机分配至贝伐珠单抗组(n=228)或贝伐珠单抗加厄洛替尼组(n=224)。在最终分析时,贝伐珠单抗组的中位随访时间为 51.0 个月(IQR 36.0-60.0),贝伐珠单抗加厄洛替尼组为 48.3 个月(31.5-61.0)。在主要分析(发生 231 例无进展生存事件后)中,随机分组后无进展生存期的中位时间为贝伐珠单抗加厄洛替尼组 5.1 个月(95%CI 4.1-5.9),贝伐珠单抗组为 6.0 个月(4.6-7.9)(分层危险比[HR]0.79[95%CI 0.60-1.06];p=0.11;非分层 HR 0.76[0.59-0.99];p=0.043)。在最终分析时,随机分组后无进展生存期的中位时间为贝伐珠单抗加厄洛替尼组 5.4 个月(95%CI 4.3-6.2),贝伐珠单抗组为 4.9 个月(4.1-5.7)(分层 HR 0.81[95%CI 0.66-1.01],p=0.059;非分层 HR 0.78[0.68-0.96],p=0.019)。在最终分析时,贝伐珠单抗加厄洛替尼组维持治疗的中位总生存期为 24.9 个月(95%CI 21.4-28.9),贝伐珠单抗组为 22.1 个月(19.6-26.7)(分层 HR 0.79[95%CI 0.63-0.99],p=0.036;非分层 HR 0.79[0.64-0.98],p=0.035)。最常见的 3-4 级不良事件为皮疹(贝伐珠单抗加厄洛替尼组 220 例患者中有 47 例[21%],贝伐珠单抗组 224 例患者中无 1 例)、腹泻(21 例[10%]比 2 例[<1%])和乏力(12 例[5%]比 2 例[<1%])。

结论

在贝伐珠单抗诱导治疗后,贝伐珠单抗联合厄洛替尼可能是不可切除转移性结直肠癌一线治疗中一种新的非化疗维持治疗选择。

资金来源

GERCOR 和 F Hoffmann-La Roche。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验