Oliveira Gisele, Hirani Shashivadan P, Epstein Ruth, Yazigi Latife, Behlau Mara
Touro College, Brooklyn, New York, USA; Centro de Estudos da Voz - CEV, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Health Services Research, City University London, UK.
J Voice. 2016 Mar;30(2):247.e13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
To perform the validation of the Brazilian version of the Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire (B-VDCQ) using procedures according to the Scientific Advisory Committee of Medical Outcomes Trust and psychometric analyses to determine the scales validity and reliability.
In the preliminary procedures, the VDCQ was administered to 14 patients to determine if items were culturally valid and propose possible adaptations for a B-VDCQ. The sample of this study consisted of a data set of 178 individuals, 87 with vocal complaint, comprising 19 men and 68 women, with mean age of 34.1 years and 91 without vocal complaint, comprising 29 men and 62 women, with mean age of 32.4 years. To demonstrate validity, the B-VDCQ scores were compared to vocal self-assessment and perceptual analysis. To determine the reliability and test-retest reproducibility, 14 voice patients repeated the measurement between 3 and 14 days after the first administration.
Principal component analyses of the patients with vocal complaint yielded four coping strategies: venting, support seeking, minimisation, and avoidant acceptance. Subscales of the questionnaire showed acceptable internal consistency and reproducibility values, apart from the minimisation subscale. B-VDCQ validity was demonstrated through relationships with perceptual analyses and vocal self-assessment and subscale score differences between the two groups.
The B-VDCQ has been submitted to essential steps necessary for cultural adaptation and validation. It is a simple instrument to administer and shows to be specific for evaluating patients with voice problems. The B-VDCQ can be an important addition to the voice evaluation of patients with dysphonia.
根据医学结局信托科学咨询委员会的程序对巴西版嗓音残疾应对问卷(B - VDCQ)进行验证,并通过心理测量分析来确定该量表的有效性和可靠性。
在初步程序中,对14名患者进行VDCQ测试,以确定条目在文化上是否有效,并为B - VDCQ提出可能的调整建议。本研究样本包括178名个体的数据集,其中87名有嗓音问题,包括19名男性和68名女性,平均年龄34.1岁;91名无嗓音问题,包括29名男性和62名女性,平均年龄32.4岁。为证明有效性,将B - VDCQ得分与嗓音自我评估和感知分析进行比较。为确定可靠性和重测信度,14名嗓音患者在首次测试后3至14天重复测量。
对有嗓音问题患者的主成分分析得出四种应对策略:宣泄、寻求支持、淡化和回避接受。问卷的子量表显示出可接受的内部一致性和重测信度值,但淡化子量表除外。通过与感知分析和嗓音自我评估的关系以及两组之间子量表得分差异证明了B - VDCQ的有效性。
B - VDCQ已完成文化调适和验证所需的必要步骤。它是一种易于使用的工具,对评估嗓音问题患者具有特异性。B - VDCQ可为嗓音障碍患者的嗓音评估提供重要补充。