Dungan Kathleen, Binkley Philip, Osei Kwame
The Ohio State University Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, 1581 Dodd Drive, Columbus, OH 43210.
The Ohio State University Dorothy M. Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, 244 Davis Heart & Lung Research Institute, 473 W. 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210; The Ohio State University Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, 244 Davis Heart & Lung Research Institute, 473 W. 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210.
J Diabetes Complications. 2016 Jan-Feb;30(1):150-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
The objective of this study is to assess hypoglycemia and glycemic variability (GV) in hospitalized patients with and without heart failure (HF) exacerbation.
Hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with (N=35) or without (N=16) HF who had hyperglycemia or significant insulin use were included. Subjects underwent continuous glucose monitoring during algorithmic titration of basal bolus insulin.
HF subjects had lower glucose coefficient of variation ([CV], 31±12 vs. 22±8.2, p=0.02), lower Low Blood Glucose Index (LBGI) and less hypoglycemia (25% vs. 2.6%, p=0.02), but similar mean glucose and glycemic lability index as non-HF subjects on day 1, but not on day 2. Sensor CV was correlated with hypoglycemia (ρ 0.32, p=0.02), HF status (ρ -0.35, p=0.013), T2D duration (ρ 0.29, p=0.04), insulin use prior to admission (ρ 0.42, p=0.002) and catecholamine levels. After controlling for differences in age, HbA1c, hypoglycemia, catecholamine levels, QT interval, and beta blocker use, only HF and diabetes duration or insulin use prior to admission were independent predictors of CV. HF had less robust associations with LBGI in multivariable models.
HF is not associated with increased GV or hypoglycemia risk during initial titration of insulin. Further research is needed to determine prognostic implications.
本研究的目的是评估有和没有心力衰竭(HF)加重的住院患者的低血糖和血糖变异性(GV)。
纳入有(N = 35)或无(N = 16)HF的2型糖尿病(T2D)住院患者,这些患者有高血糖或大量使用胰岛素。在基础推注胰岛素的算法滴定期间,受试者接受持续葡萄糖监测。
HF受试者的葡萄糖变异系数([CV],31±12对22±8.2,p = 0.02)、低血糖指数(LBGI)较低且低血糖较少(25%对2.6%,p = 0.02),但在第1天与非HF受试者的平均血糖和血糖不稳定指数相似,但在第2天则不然。传感器CV与低血糖(ρ 0.32,p = 0.02)、HF状态(ρ -0.35,p = 0.013)、T2D病程(ρ 0.29,p = 0.04)、入院前胰岛素使用情况(ρ 0.42,p = 0.002)和儿茶酚胺水平相关。在控制年龄、糖化血红蛋白、低血糖、儿茶酚胺水平、QT间期和β受体阻滞剂使用的差异后,只有HF以及糖尿病病程或入院前胰岛素使用情况是CV的独立预测因素。在多变量模型中,HF与LBGI的关联较弱。
在胰岛素初始滴定期间,HF与GV增加或低血糖风险无关。需要进一步研究以确定其预后意义。