• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据血流和压力阶差模式对主动脉瓣狭窄进行分类有助于深入了解疾病的病理生理学。

Classification of Aortic Stenosis by Flow and Gradient Patterns Provides Insights into the Pathophysiology of Disease.

作者信息

Bhattacharyya Sanjeev, Mittal Tarun, Abayalingam Mayavan, Kabir Tito, Dalby Miles, Cleland John G, Baltabaeva Aigul, Rahman Haley Shelley

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Harefield Hospital, London, United Kingdom Echocardiography Laboratory, Harefield Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Department of Imaging, Harefield Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Angiology. 2016 Aug;67(7):664-9. doi: 10.1177/0003319715611804. Epub 2015 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1177/0003319715611804
PMID:26475710
Abstract

Different patterns of flow and valve gradients can lead to diagnostic uncertainty about the severity of aortic stenosis (AS). Consecutive patients with severe AS (valve area <1 cm(2)) underwent echocardiography and computed tomography. Patients were classified into 4 groups (high-gradient/normal flow [HGNF], high-gradient/low flow [HGLF], low-gradient/normal flow [LGNF], and low-gradient/low flow [LGLF]). Low flow was defined as stroke volume index <35 mL/m(2) and low gradient as a mean aortic gradient <40 mm Hg. Aortic valve calcification (AVC) was calculated using the Agatston score. Of 181 patients, 56, 30, 46, and 49 had HGNF, HGLF, LGNF and LGLF with median AVC of 2048, 2015, 1366, and 1178 AU/m(2) (P < .0001) and valvuloarterial impedance of 4.5, 6.4, 4.2, and 5.9, respectively (P < .0001). Among those with LGLF, AVC was lower in patients with preserved compared to reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (1018 vs 2550 AU/m(2); P < .0001), but valvuloarterial impedance was similar (P = .33). The LGLF AS with preserved ejection fraction is associated with lower AVC and may identify patients with less severe AS in association with an adaptive ventricular response to high afterload.

摘要

不同的血流模式和瓣膜压差会导致对主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)严重程度的诊断存在不确定性。对连续的重度AS患者(瓣膜面积<1 cm²)进行了超声心动图和计算机断层扫描检查。患者被分为4组(高梯度/正常血流[HGNF]、高梯度/低血流[HGLF]、低梯度/正常血流[LGNF]和低梯度/低血流[LGLF])。低血流定义为每搏量指数<35 mL/m²,低梯度定义为平均主动脉压差<40 mmHg。使用阿加斯顿评分计算主动脉瓣钙化(AVC)。在181例患者中,56例、30例、46例和49例分别为HGNF、HGLF、LGNF和LGLF,中位AVC分别为2048、2015、1366和1178 AU/m²(P<.0001),瓣膜动脉阻抗分别为4.5、6.4、4.2和5.9(P<.0001)。在LGLF患者中,与左心室射血分数降低的患者相比,左心室射血分数保留的患者AVC较低(1018 vs 2550 AU/m²;P<.0001),但瓣膜动脉阻抗相似(P = 0.33)。射血分数保留的LGLF AS与较低的AVC相关,可能识别出AS较轻且心室对高后负荷有适应性反应的患者。

相似文献

1
Classification of Aortic Stenosis by Flow and Gradient Patterns Provides Insights into the Pathophysiology of Disease.根据血流和压力阶差模式对主动脉瓣狭窄进行分类有助于深入了解疾病的病理生理学。
Angiology. 2016 Aug;67(7):664-9. doi: 10.1177/0003319715611804. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
2
The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study.不和谐严重钙化主动脉瓣疾病分级的复杂性:联合多普勒超声心动图和计算机断层扫描研究的新见解。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Dec 17;62(24):2329-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1621. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
3
Diagnostic Value of Aortic Valve Calcification Levels in the Assessment of Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.主动脉瓣钙化程度对低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄评估的诊断价值。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Aug;17(8):847-860. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.03.014. Epub 2024 May 22.
4
Association of Time Between Left Ventricular and Aortic Systolic Pressure Peaks With Severity of Aortic Stenosis and Calcification of Aortic Valve.左心室和主动脉收缩压峰值之间的时间关联与主动脉瓣狭窄和主动脉瓣钙化的严重程度。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Jun 1;4(6):549-555. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1180.
5
Assessment of aortic valve calcium load by multidetector computed tomography. Anatomical validation, impact of scanner settings and incremental diagnostic value.多排螺旋 CT 评估主动脉瓣钙负荷。解剖学验证、扫描参数的影响和增量诊断价值。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Sep-Oct;11(5):360-366. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
6
Aortic valve replacement reduces valvuloarterial impedance but does not affect systemic arterial compliance in elderly men with degenerative calcific trileaflet aortic valve stenosis.对于患有退行性钙化三叶主动脉瓣狭窄的老年男性,主动脉瓣置换术可降低瓣膜动脉阻抗,但不影响全身动脉顺应性。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014 Dec;28(6):1540-4. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.05.017. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
7
Impact of Vascular Hemodynamics on Aortic Stenosis Evaluation: New Insights Into the Pathophysiology of Normal Flow-Small Aortic Valve Area-Low Gradient Pattern.血管血流动力学对主动脉瓣狭窄评估的影响:正常血流-小主动脉瓣面积-低跨瓣压差模式病理生理学的新见解
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jul 7;6(7):e006276. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006276.
8
Correlates of the ratio of acceleration time to ejection time in patients with aortic stenosis: An echocardiographic and computed tomography study.主动脉瓣狭窄患者加速度时间与射血时间比值的相关因素:一项超声心动图和计算机断层扫描研究。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2019 Oct;112(10):567-575. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
9
Influence of aortic valve leaflet calcification on dynamic aortic valve motion assessed by cardiac computed tomography.心脏计算机断层扫描评估主动脉瓣叶钙化对主动脉瓣动态运动的影响。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Nov-Dec;10(6):485-490. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
10
Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Solving the Conundrum Using Multi-Modality Imaging.低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄:应用多模态影像学解决难题。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Nov-Dec;61(5-6):416-422. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Coronary Microcirculation in Aortic Stenosis.主动脉瓣狭窄的冠状动脉微循环。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Aug;12(8):e007547. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007547. Epub 2019 Aug 16.