Van der Biest Lien, Legrain Valéry, Paepe Annick De, Crombez Geert
Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000 Gent, Belgium.
Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue Mounier 53 bte B1.53.04, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
Behav Brain Res. 2016 Jan 15;297:307-14. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.10.028. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
During medical examinations, doctors regularly investigate a patient's somatosensory system by approaching the patient with a medical device (e.g. Von Frey hairs, algometer) or with their hands. It is assumed that the obtained results reflect the true capacities of the somatosensory system. However, evidence from crossmodal spatial research suggests that sensory experiences in one modality (e.g. touch) can be influenced by concurrent information from other modalities (e.g. vision), especially near the body (i.e. in peripersonal space). Hence, we hypothesized that seeing someone approaching your body could alter tactile sensitivity in that body-part. In the In Vivo Approaching Object (IVAO) paradigm, participants detected and localized threshold-level vibrotactile stimuli administered on the left of right hand (=tactile targets). In Experiment 1, this was always preceded by the experimenter approaching the same (congruent trials) or the other (incongruent trials) hand with a pen (=visual cue). In Experiment 2, a condition was added in which a point further away from the hands (also left vs. right) was approached. Response Accuracy was calculated for congruent and incongruent trials (Experiment 1 & 2) and compared between the close and far condition (Experiment 2). As expected, Response Accuracy was higher in congruent trials compared to incongruent trials, but only near the body. As a result, evidence was found for a crossmodal interaction effect between visual and tactile information in peripersonal space. These results suggest that somatosensory evaluations-both medical or research-based-may be biased by viewing an object approaching the body.
在医学检查期间,医生经常通过使用医疗设备(如冯·弗里氏毛发、痛觉计)或用手接近患者来检查其躯体感觉系统。人们认为所获得的结果反映了躯体感觉系统的真实能力。然而,跨通道空间研究的证据表明,一种感觉通道(如触觉)中的感官体验可能会受到来自其他感觉通道(如视觉)的同时信息的影响,尤其是在身体附近(即在个人空间周围)。因此,我们假设看到有人接近你的身体可能会改变该身体部位的触觉敏感度。在体内接近物体(IVAO)范式中,参与者检测并定位施加在左手或右手左侧的阈限水平振动触觉刺激(=触觉目标)。在实验1中,这总是先由实验者用一支笔接近同一只手(一致试验)或另一只手(不一致试验)(=视觉线索)。在实验2中,增加了一种条件,即接近离手更远的一个点(也是左侧与右侧)。计算一致和不一致试验(实验1和2)的反应准确性,并在近距离和远距离条件之间进行比较(实验2)。正如预期的那样,与不一致试验相比,一致试验中的反应准确性更高,但仅在身体附近。结果,发现了个人空间周围视觉和触觉信息之间的跨通道交互作用效应的证据。这些结果表明,无论是基于医学还是研究的躯体感觉评估,都可能因看到物体接近身体而产生偏差。