Youn Bora, Soley-Bori Marina, Soria-Saucedo Rene, Ryan Colleen M, Schneider Jeffrey C, Haynes Alex B, Cabral Howard J, Kazis Lewis E
Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Center for the Assessment of Pharmaceutical Practices (CAPP), Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Surgery. 2016 Mar;159(3):919-29. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
Readmission rates after operative procedures are used increasingly as a measure of hospital care quality. Patient access to care may influence readmission rates. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between patient cost-sharing, insurance arrangements, and the risk of postoperative readmissions.
Using the MarketScan Research Database (n = 121,002), we examined privately insured, nonelderly patients who underwent abdominal surgery in 2010. The main outcome measures were risk-adjusted unplanned readmissions within 7 days and 30 days of discharge. Odds of readmissions were compared with multivariable logistic regression models.
In adjusted models, $1,284 increase in patient out-of-pocket payments during index admission (a difference of one standard deviation) was associated with 19% decrease in the odds of 7-day readmission (odds ratio [OR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.85) and 17% decrease in the odds of 30-day readmission (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.81-0.86). Patients in the noncapitated point-of-service plans (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.07-1.33), preferred provider organization plans (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03-1.19), and high-deductible plans (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.00-1.26) were more likely to be readmitted within 30 days compared with patients in the capitated health maintenance organization and point-of-service plans.
Among privately insured, nonelderly patients, increased patient cost-sharing was associated with lower odds of 7-day and 30-day readmission after abdominal surgery. Insurance arrangements also were significantly associated with postoperative readmissions. Patient cost sharing and insurance arrangements need consideration in the provision of equitable access for quality care.
手术操作后的再入院率越来越多地被用作衡量医院护理质量的指标。患者获得医疗服务的机会可能会影响再入院率。本研究的目的是确定患者费用分担、保险安排与术后再入院风险之间的关系。
使用市场扫描研究数据库(n = 121,002),我们研究了2010年接受腹部手术的私人保险非老年患者。主要结局指标是出院后7天和30天内风险调整后的非计划再入院情况。使用多变量逻辑回归模型比较再入院的几率。
在调整后的模型中,首次入院期间患者自付费用增加1284美元(相差一个标准差)与7天再入院几率降低19%(比值比[OR]0.81,95%置信区间[CI]0.78 - 0.85)以及30天再入院几率降低17%(OR 0.83,95% CI 0.81 - 0.86)相关。与按人头付费的健康维护组织和服务点计划的患者相比,非按人头付费的服务点计划(OR 1.19,95% CI 1.07 - 1.33)、优先提供者组织计划(OR 1.11,95% CI 1.03 - 1.19)和高免赔额计划(OR 1.12,95% CI 1.00 - 1.26)的患者在30天内更有可能再次入院。
在私人保险的非老年患者中,患者费用分担增加与腹部手术后7天和30天再入院几率降低相关。保险安排也与术后再入院显著相关。在提供公平的优质医疗服务时,需要考虑患者费用分担和保险安排。