Suppr超能文献

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版创伤后应激障碍症状的区分效度及性别差异

Discriminant validity and gender differences in DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms.

作者信息

Carragher Natacha, Sunderland Matthew, Batterham Philip J, Calear Alison L, Elhai Jon D, Chapman Catherine, Mills Katherine

机构信息

National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2016 Jan 15;190:56-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.09.071. Epub 2015 Oct 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) literature is replete with investigations of factor structure, however, few empirical studies have examined discriminant validity and the moderating role of gender on factor structure and symptom expression. This study aimed to address these gaps.

METHODS

An online, population-based study of 3175 Australian adults was conducted. This study analyzed data from 642 participants who reported a traumatic event. Overall, 10.2% (13.4% females, 7.6% males) met diagnostic criteria for current PTSD.

RESULTS

Confirmatory factor analyses indicated that eight factor models provided excellent fit to the data. The DSM-5 model, anhedonia and hybrid models provided strong fit to the data, based on statistical fit indices and parsimony. The models' factors were significantly associated with a number of external correlates. Factor structure was gender invariant for the three models, albeit significant latent mean-level differences were apparent in relation to the intrusion/re-experiencing and alterations in arousal and reactivity factors. Bonferroni-adjusted Wald chi-square tests indicated significant gender differences in four DSM-5 PTSD symptoms: females reported significantly higher rates of negative beliefs, diminished interest, restricted affect and sleep disturbance symptoms compared to men.

LIMITATIONS

Response rate to the survey was low. However, the number of respondents who completed the survey was high and population weights were employed to account for self-selection biases and aid generalizability.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings provide support for the DSM-5, anhedonia and hybrid models compared to alternative models based on DSM-5 symptoms. Discriminant validity analyses indicated similar patterns of significant associations with the transdiagnostic factors, potentially suggesting that all the PTSD factors are related to non-specific distress. Further research investigating how gender influences PTSD symptom expression is warranted, including possible gender differences in symptom item interpretation.

摘要

背景

创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的文献中充斥着关于因素结构的研究,然而,很少有实证研究考察区分效度以及性别在因素结构和症状表现中的调节作用。本研究旨在填补这些空白。

方法

对3175名澳大利亚成年人进行了一项基于人群的在线研究。本研究分析了642名报告有创伤事件的参与者的数据。总体而言,10.2%(女性为13.4%,男性为7.6%)符合当前PTSD的诊断标准。

结果

验证性因素分析表明,八个因素模型与数据拟合良好。基于统计拟合指数和简约性,DSM-5模型、快感缺失模型和混合模型与数据拟合良好。这些模型的因素与许多外部相关因素显著相关。这三个模型的因素结构在性别上是不变的,尽管在侵入/重新体验以及唤醒和反应性因素的改变方面存在明显的潜在平均水平差异。Bonferroni校正的Wald卡方检验表明,在DSM-5的四种PTSD症状中存在显著的性别差异:与男性相比,女性报告的负面信念、兴趣减退、情感受限和睡眠障碍症状的发生率显著更高。

局限性

调查的回复率较低。然而,完成调查的受访者数量较多,并且采用了总体权重来考虑自我选择偏差并有助于推广。

结论

与基于DSM-5症状的替代模型相比,研究结果为DSM-5、快感缺失模型和混合模型提供了支持。区分效度分析表明,与跨诊断因素的显著关联模式相似,这可能表明所有PTSD因素都与非特异性困扰有关。有必要进一步研究性别如何影响PTSD症状表现,包括症状项目解释中可能存在的性别差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验