Suppr超能文献

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激症状的维度结构:对快感缺失与外化行为混合模型的支持

Dimensional structure of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress symptoms: support for a hybrid Anhedonia and Externalizing Behaviors model.

作者信息

Armour Cherie, Tsai Jack, Durham Tory A, Charak Ruby, Biehn Tracey L, Elhai Jon D, Pietrzak Robert H

机构信息

Psychology Research Institute, University of Ulster, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, UK.

United States Department of Veterans Affairs New England Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, West Haven, CT, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Feb;61:106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.10.012. Epub 2014 Nov 22.

Abstract

Several revisions to the symptom clusters of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have been made in the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). Central to the focus of this study was the revision of PTSD's tripartite structure in DSM-IV into four symptom clusters in DSM-5. Emerging confirmatory factor analytic (CFA) studies have suggested that DSM-5 PTSD symptoms may be best represented by one of two 6-factor models: (1) an Externalizing Behaviors model characterized by a factor which combines the irritability/anger and self-destructive/reckless behavior items; and (2) an Anhedonia model characterized by items of loss of interest, detachment, and restricted affect. The current study conducted CFAs of DSM-5 PTSD symptoms assessed using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) in two independent and diverse trauma-exposed samples of a nationally representative sample of 1484 U.S. veterans and a sample of 497 Midwestern U.S. university undergraduate students. Relative fits of the DSM-5 model, the DSM-5 Dysphoria model, the DSM-5 Dysphoric Arousal model, the two 6-factor models, and a newly proposed 7-factor Hybrid model, which consolidates the two 6-factor models, were evaluated. Results revealed that, in both samples, both 6-factor models provided significantly better fit than the 4-factor DSM-5 model, the DSM-5 Dysphoria model and the DSM-5 Dysphoric Arousal model. Further, the 7-factor Hybrid model, which incorporates key features of both 6-factor models and is comprised of re-experiencing, avoidance, negative affect, anhedonia, externalizing behaviors, and anxious and dysphoric arousal symptom clusters, provided superior fit to the data in both samples. Results are discussed in light of theoretical and empirical support for the latent structure of DSM-5 PTSD symptoms.

摘要

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM-5)第5版对创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的症状群进行了多项修订。本研究的核心重点是将DSM-IV中PTSD的三方结构修订为DSM-5中的四个症状群。新出现的验证性因素分析(CFA)研究表明,DSM-5 PTSD症状可能由以下两种六因素模型之一得到最佳体现:(1)一种外化行为模型,其特征在于一个将易怒/愤怒与自我毁灭/鲁莽行为项目合并的因素;(2)一种快感缺失模型,其特征在于兴趣丧失、情感疏离和情感受限的项目。本研究在两个独立且不同的受创伤样本中对使用DSM-5创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL-5)评估的DSM-5 PTSD症状进行了CFA分析,这两个样本分别是具有全国代表性的1484名美国退伍军人样本和497名美国中西部大学本科生样本。对DSM-5模型、DSM-5烦躁模型、DSM-5烦躁唤醒模型、两种六因素模型以及一个新提出的整合了两种六因素模型的七因素混合模型的相对拟合度进行了评估。结果显示,在两个样本中,两种六因素模型的拟合度均显著优于四因素DSM-5模型、DSM-5烦躁模型和DSM-5烦躁唤醒模型。此外,七因素混合模型结合了两种六因素模型的关键特征,由重新体验、回避、消极情绪、快感缺失、外化行为以及焦虑和烦躁唤醒症状群组成,在两个样本中对数据的拟合度都更高。结合对DSM-5 PTSD症状潜在结构的理论和实证支持对结果进行了讨论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验