Schjerning Olsen Anne-Marie, Lindhardsen Jesper, Gislason Gunnar H, McGettigan Patricia, Hlatky Mark A, Fosbøl Emil, Køber Lars, Torp-Pedersen Christian, Lamberts Morten
Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark William Harvey Research Institute (WHRI) at Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark.
BMJ. 2015 Oct 19;351:h5096. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5096.
What is the effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in post-myocardial infarction patients taking antithrombotics and treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)?
This was a nationwide cohort study based on linked administrative registry data from all hospitals in Denmark between 1997 and 2011. The study included patients aged 30 years and over admitted with a first myocardial infarction who survived at least 30 days after discharge. The association between PPIs and risk of gastrointestinal bleeding according to NSAID plus antithrombotic therapy was estimated using adjusted time dependent Cox regression models.
The use of PPIs was independently associated with decreased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in post-myocardial infarction patients taking antithrombotics and treated with NSAIDs. Of 82,955 post-myocardial infarction patients (mean age 67.4 years, 64% (n=53,070) men), all of whom were taking single or dual antithrombotic therapy, 42.5% (n=35,233) filled at least one prescription for NSAIDs and 45.5% (n=37,771) received PPIs. Over a mean follow-up of 5.1 years, 3229 gastrointestinal bleeds occurred. The crude incidence rates of bleeding (events/100 person years) on NSAID plus antithrombotic therapy were 1.8 for patients taking PPIs and 2.1 for those not taking PPIs. The adjusted risk of bleeding was lower with PPI use (hazard ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.54 to 0.95) regardless of antithrombotic treatment regimen, type of NSAID, and type of PPI used. The main limitation of the study is its observational non-randomised design. The results suggest that PPI treatment probably has a beneficial effect regardless of underlying gastrointestinal risk and that when NSAIDs cannot be avoided in post-myocardial infarction patients, physicians might prescribe a PPI as well. The study does not clarify whether PPIs might be safely omitted in specific subgroups of patients with a low risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.
In post-myocardial infarction patients, bleeding complications have been associated with both antithrombotic and NSAID treatment. Concurrent use of PPIs was independently associated with a decreased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in post-myocardial infarction patients taking antithrombotics and NSAID, regardless of antithrombotic treatment regimen, type of NSAID, and type of PPI used.
FUNDING, COMPETING INTERESTS, DATA SHARING: AMSO has received a grant from the Danish Council of Independent Research (grant 12-132760). GHG is supported by an unrestricted research scholarship from the Novo Nordisk Foundation.
质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)对服用抗血栓药物并接受非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)治疗的心肌梗死后患者发生胃肠道出血风险有何影响?
这是一项基于丹麦1997年至2011年所有医院相关行政登记数据的全国性队列研究。该研究纳入年龄30岁及以上因首次心肌梗死入院且出院后至少存活30天的患者。根据NSAID加抗血栓治疗情况,使用校正的时间依赖性Cox回归模型估计PPIs与胃肠道出血风险之间的关联。
在服用抗血栓药物并接受NSAIDs治疗的心肌梗死后患者中,使用PPIs与胃肠道出血风险降低独立相关。在82955例心肌梗死后患者(平均年龄67.4岁,64%(n = 53070)为男性)中,所有患者均接受单药或双联抗血栓治疗,42.5%(n = 35233)至少开具过1张NSAIDs处方,45.5%(n = 37771)接受了PPIs治疗。在平均5.1年的随访期间,发生了3229例胃肠道出血。服用PPIs的患者在NSAID加抗血栓治疗时的出血粗发病率(事件/100人年)为1.8,未服用PPIs的患者为2.1。无论抗血栓治疗方案、NSAID类型和使用的PPI类型如何,使用PPI均可降低出血风险(风险比0.72,95%置信区间0.54至0.95)。该研究的主要局限性在于其观察性非随机设计。结果表明,无论潜在的胃肠道风险如何,PPI治疗可能都具有有益作用,并且当心肌梗死后患者无法避免使用NSAIDs时,医生也可能会开具PPI。该研究未阐明在胃肠道出血风险低的特定患者亚组中是否可以安全停用PPIs。
在心肌梗死后患者中,出血并发症与抗血栓治疗和NSAIDs治疗均有关。在服用抗血栓药物和NSAIDs的心肌梗死后患者中,同时使用PPIs与胃肠道出血风险降低独立相关,无论抗血栓治疗方案、NSAID类型和使用的PPI类型如何。
资金、利益冲突、数据共享:AMSO已获得丹麦独立研究理事会的资助(资助编号12 - 132760)。GHG由诺和诺德基金会提供的无限制研究奖学金资助。