Department of Cardiology, Post 635, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Niels Andersens Vej 65, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark.
Circulation. 2012 Sep 4;126(10):1185-93. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.114967. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
Uncertainty remains over optimal antithrombotic treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation presenting with myocardial infarction and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. We investigated the risk and time frame for bleeding following myocardial infarction/percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with atrial fibrillation according to antithrombotic treatment.
Patients with atrial fibrillation and admitted with myocardial infarction or for percutaneous coronary intervention between 2000 and 2009 (11 480 subjects, mean age 75.6 years [SD ±10.3], males 60.9%) were identified by individual level linkage of nationwide registries in Denmark. Fatal or nonfatal (requiring hospitalization) bleeding was determined according to antithrombotic treatment regimen: triple therapy (TT) with vitamin K antagonist (VKA)+aspirin+clopidogrel, VKA+antiplatelet, and dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin+clopidogrel. We calculated crude incidence rates and adjusted hazard ratios by Cox regression models. Within 1 year, 728 bleeding events were recorded (6.3%); 79 were fatal (0.7%). Within 30 days, rates were 22.6, 20.3, and 14.3 bleeding events per 100 person-years for TT, VKA+antiplatelet, and dual antiplatelet therapy, respectively. Both early (within 90 days) and delayed (90-360 days) bleeding risk with TT exposure in relation to VKA+antiplatelet was increased; hazard ratio 1.47 (1.04;2.08) and 1.36 (0.95;1.95), respectively. No significant difference in thromboembolic risk was observed for TT versus VKA+antiplatelet; hazard ratio, 1.15 (0.95;1.40).
High risk of bleeding is immediately evident with TT after myocardial infarction/percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with atrial fibrillation. A continually elevated risk associated with TT indicates no safe therapeutic window, and TT should only be prescribed after thorough bleeding risk assessment of patients.
对于伴有心肌梗死和/或接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心房颤动患者,最佳抗血栓治疗仍存在不确定性。我们根据抗血栓治疗方法研究了心房颤动患者心肌梗死/经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后出血的风险和时间框架。
通过丹麦全国登记处的个体水平链接,确定了 2000 年至 2009 年间因心肌梗死或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗入院的心房颤动患者(11480 例,平均年龄 75.6 岁[SD±10.3],男性 60.9%)。根据抗血栓治疗方案确定致命或非致命(需要住院治疗)出血:维生素 K 拮抗剂(VKA)+阿司匹林+氯吡格雷三联治疗、VKA+抗血小板治疗和阿司匹林+氯吡格雷双联抗血小板治疗。我们通过 Cox 回归模型计算了粗发生率和调整后的危险比。在 1 年内记录了 728 例出血事件(6.3%);79 例为致命性(0.7%)。在 30 天内,TT、VKA+抗血小板治疗和双联抗血小板治疗的出血发生率分别为每 100 人年 22.6、20.3 和 14.3 例。与 VKA+抗血小板治疗相比,TT 暴露后的早期(90 天内)和晚期(90-360 天)出血风险均增加;危险比分别为 1.47(1.04;2.08)和 1.36(0.95;1.95)。TT 与 VKA+抗血小板治疗相比,血栓栓塞风险无显著差异;危险比为 1.15(0.95;1.40)。
心房颤动患者心肌梗死/经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,TT 即刻出血风险高。TT 持续升高的风险表明没有安全的治疗窗口,只有在对患者进行彻底的出血风险评估后,才应开 TT 处方。