Iqbal M Bilal, Nadra Imad J, Ding Lillian, Fung Anthony, Aymong Eve, Chan Albert W, Hodge Steven, Della Siega Anthony, Robinson Simon D
Victoria Heart Institute Foundation, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Royal Jubilee Hospital, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul;88(1):73-83. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26237. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
Embolic protection devices (EPDs) have been designed and introduced to reduce distal embolization and peri-procedural myocardial infarction during saphenous vein graft (SVG) intervention. Current guidelines give a class I recommendation to EPD use during SVG intervention when technically feasible. However, the routine use of these devices has recently been debated.
We analyzed 1,359 patients undergoing isolated SVG intervention between 2008 and 2013 in the British Columbia Cardiac Registry. We analyzed (a) post-procedural TIMI flow; and (b) target vessel revascularization (TVR) and mortality at 1 and 2 years.
EPD use was an independent predictor of post-procedural TIMI 2/3 flow (OR = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.51-3.74, P < 0.001). At 1 year, EPD use was an independent predictor for lower TVR (HR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.14-0.85, P = 0.021) and a trend towards lower mortality (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.18-1.10, P = 0.082). These associations were lost at 2 years where EPD use was not predictive of mortality (HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.33-1.17, P = 0.144) or TVR (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.41-1.17, P = 0.176). These findings were confirmed in propensity-matched and inverse probability treatment weighted analyses.
In this analysis of patients undergoing SVG intervention, EPD use was a strong predictor for improved post-procedural TIMI flow. Whilst EPD use was associated with lower TVR and a trend for lower mortality at 1 year, these associations were lost at 2 years. These findings would appear to support the use of EPD for SVG intervention. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
已设计并引入了栓子保护装置(EPD),以减少大隐静脉桥血管(SVG)介入治疗期间的远端栓塞和围手术期心肌梗死。当前指南对在技术可行时SVG介入治疗期间使用EPD给出了I类推荐。然而,这些装置的常规使用最近受到了争议。
我们分析了2008年至2013年间在不列颠哥伦比亚心脏登记处接受单纯SVG介入治疗的1359例患者。我们分析了(a)术后TIMI血流;以及(b)1年和2年时的靶血管血运重建(TVR)和死亡率。
使用EPD是术后TIMI 2/3级血流的独立预测因素(OR = 2.38,95%CI:1.51 - 3.74,P < 0.001)。在1年时,使用EPD是较低TVR的独立预测因素(HR = 0.35,95%CI:0.14 - 0.85,P = 0.021)以及死亡率降低的趋势(HR = 0.45,95%CI:0.18 - 1.10,P = 0.082)。在2年时这些关联消失,此时使用EPD不能预测死亡率(HR = 0.62,95%CI:0.33 - 1.17,P = 0.144)或TVR(HR = 0.70,95%CI:0.41 - 1.17,P = 0.176)。这些发现在校正倾向匹配和逆概率加权分析中得到了证实。
在这项对接受SVG介入治疗患者的分析中,使用EPD是术后TIMI血流改善的有力预测因素。虽然使用EPD与1年时较低的TVR以及死亡率降低的趋势相关,但这些关联在2年时消失。这些发现似乎支持在SVG介入治疗中使用EPD。© 2015威利期刊公司