• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉旁路移植术后接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的单中心注册研究分析

Single-Centre Registry Analysis of Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Their Coronary Bypass Grafts.

作者信息

Kim Wan Cheol, Hirsch Gregory, Kells Catherine, Quraishi Ata-Ur-Rehman, Bishop Helen, Kidwai Bakhtiar, Title Lawrence, Beydoun Hussein, Sandila Navjot, Sumaya Wael, Elkhateeb Osama

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

CJC Open. 2023 Nov 10;6(3):548-555. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.11.005. eCollection 2024 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.cjco.2023.11.005
PMID:38559334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10980898/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The study assessed the outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to bypass grafts, focusing on all-cause mortality and target vessel failure (TVF) rates.

METHODS

A single-centre registry analysis included 364 patients who underwent PCI on coronary bypass grafts between 2008 and 2019. The study analyzed all-cause mortality and TVF, which encompassed target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, and medically treated occluded target graft post-PCI.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 71 years (interquartile range: [IQR] 65-78), with 82.1% being male. Most patients (94.8%) received PCI on saphenous vein grafts, and the median graft age was 13.0 years (IQR: 8.4-17.6). Drug-eluting stents were used more frequently (54.4%) than bare-metal stents (45.6%), with a median stent diameter of 3.5 mm (IQR: 3-4) and length of 19 mm (IQR: 18-28). Outcome differences were not significant for PCI sites (aorto-ostial, graft body, anastomosis), use of drug-eluting stents, or use of protection devices. The 1-year mortality rate was 3.3%, whereas the combined rate of TVF or death was 20.3%. After 5 years, the mortality rate increased to 14.9%, and the combined TVF or death rate rose to 40.3%. Multivariable analyses revealed that chronic kidney disease was independently associated with mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-2.61,  = 0.007), whereas hypertension (HR 2.42, 95% CI 1.32-4.42,  = 0.004) and increased stent length (HR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02,  = 0.007) were independently associated with the TVF-or-mortality outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing PCI to bypass grafts experience considerable adverse outcomes over a 5-year period, highlighting the need for further strategies in managing this high-risk population.

摘要

背景

本研究评估了接受冠状动脉旁路移植血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者的预后,重点关注全因死亡率和靶血管失败(TVF)率。

方法

一项单中心注册研究分析纳入了2008年至2019年间364例接受冠状动脉旁路移植血管PCI的患者。该研究分析了全因死亡率和TVF,后者包括靶病变血运重建、靶血管血运重建以及PCI术后药物治疗的闭塞靶血管。

结果

患者的中位年龄为71岁(四分位间距:[IQR] 65 - 78),男性占82.1%。大多数患者(94.8%)接受了大隐静脉移植血管的PCI,移植血管的中位年龄为13.0年(IQR:8.4 - 17.6)。药物洗脱支架的使用频率(54.4%)高于裸金属支架(45.6%),支架中位直径为3.5 mm(IQR:3 - 4),长度为19 mm(IQR:18 - 28)。PCI部位(主动脉开口处、移植血管体部、吻合口)、药物洗脱支架的使用或保护装置的使用对预后的差异不显著。1年死亡率为3.3%,而TVF或死亡的联合发生率为20.3%。5年后,死亡率升至14.9%,TVF或死亡的联合发生率升至40.3%。多变量分析显示,慢性肾脏病与死亡率独立相关(风险比[HR] 1.74,95%置信区间[CI] 1.16 - 2.61,P = 0.007),而高血压(HR 2.42,95% CI 1.32 - 4.42,P = 0.004)和支架长度增加(HR 1.01,95% CI 1.00 - 1.02,P = 0.007)与TVF或死亡结局独立相关。

结论

接受冠状动脉旁路移植血管PCI的患者在5年期间经历了相当多的不良结局,凸显了对这一高危人群采取进一步治疗策略的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5247/10980898/d3389414310d/figs1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5247/10980898/e742e3dcbf44/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5247/10980898/4351017167a4/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5247/10980898/38e87b9e77a7/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5247/10980898/d3389414310d/figs1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5247/10980898/e742e3dcbf44/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5247/10980898/4351017167a4/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5247/10980898/38e87b9e77a7/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5247/10980898/d3389414310d/figs1.jpg

相似文献

1
Single-Centre Registry Analysis of Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Their Coronary Bypass Grafts.冠状动脉旁路移植术后接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的单中心注册研究分析
CJC Open. 2023 Nov 10;6(3):548-555. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.11.005. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Intravascular ultrasound to guide percutaneous coronary interventions: an evidence-based analysis.血管内超声引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(12):1-97. Epub 2006 Apr 1.
3
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗开口/中段病变与无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期临床结局:DELTA 注册研究(左主干冠状动脉疾病药物洗脱支架):一项多中心注册研究,评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干的疗效。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.005.
4
Long-term outcome following percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents in saphenous vein graft lesions: from Western Denmark Heart Registry.与裸金属支架相比,药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗隐静脉桥病变的长期预后:来自丹麦西部心脏注册研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jun 1;83(7):1035-42. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25279. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
5
In-hospital and 1-year outcomes with drug-eluting versus bare metal stents in saphenous vein graft intervention: a report from the EVENT registry.药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架在静脉桥血管介入治疗中的院内和 1 年预后:来自 EVENT 注册研究的报告。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Dec 1;80(7):1127-36. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24352. Epub 2012 May 4.
6
Safety and effectiveness of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein bypass graft percutaneous coronary interventions: insights from the Veterans Affairs CART program.药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架在隐静脉旁路移植经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的安全性和有效性:来自退伍军人事务 CART 计划的见解。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Oct 28;64(17):1825-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1207. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
7
Repeat Coronary Bypass Surgery or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Previous Surgical Revascularization.再次行冠状动脉旁路移植术或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗于先前的外科血运重建术后。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Sep;94(9):1743-1752. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.01.048.
8
Clinical outcome after surgical or percutaneous revascularization in coronary bypass graft failure.冠状动脉旁路移植失败后手术或经皮血运重建的临床转归。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2013 Jun;14(6):438-45. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328356a4fc.
9
Prognostic Impact of Residual Anatomic Disease Burden After Functionally Complete Revascularization.功能完全血运重建后残余解剖学疾病负担的预后影响
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Sep;13(9):e009232. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009232. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
10
Long-Term Outcome of Consecutive Patients With Previous Coronary Bypass Surgery, Treated With Newer-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents.既往冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者应用新一代药物洗脱支架的长期预后。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jan 30;7(3):e007212. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007212.

本文引用的文献

1
Adverse impact of chronic kidney disease on clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention.慢性肾脏病对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后临床结局的不良影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 May 1;97(6):E801-E809. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29436. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
2
Meta-analysis Comparing Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Native Artery Versus Bypass Graft in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与旁路移植术治疗冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者的疗效比较的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Feb 1;140:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.10.062. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
3
Long-Term Results After Drug-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stent Implantation in Saphenous Vein Grafts: Randomized Controlled Trial.
药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架置入治疗隐静脉桥的长期结果:随机对照试验。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Oct 20;9(20):e017434. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017434. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
4
Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusion in Native Coronary Arteries vs Saphenous Vein Grafts.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在治疗原生冠状动脉与隐静脉桥血管慢性完全闭塞病变中的临床疗效比较。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2020 Sep;32(9):350-357. doi: 10.25270/jic/20.00180. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
5
Management of Coronary Disease in Patients with Advanced Kidney Disease.晚期肾病患者的冠状动脉疾病管理。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 23;382(17):1608-1618. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915925. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
6
Contemporary Use of Embolic Protection Devices During Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention.当代应用于隐静脉移植介入术的栓塞保护装置。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 May;12(5):e007636. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007636.
7
Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死伴冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的结局。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov;11(11):e006824. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006824.
8
Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein grafts: a double-blind, randomised trial.药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架在静脉桥中的应用:一项双盲、随机试验。
Lancet. 2018 May 19;391(10134):1997-2007. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30801-8. Epub 2018 May 11.
9
Efficacy Over Time With Drug-Eluting Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions.药物洗脱支架在静脉桥病变中的时间疗效。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 8;71(18):1973-1982. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.03.456.
10
The impact of chronic kidney disease on outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with complex coronary artery disease: five-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial.慢性肾脏病对复杂冠状动脉疾病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗后结局的影响:SYNTAX 试验五年随访。
EuroIntervention. 2018 May 20;14(1):102-111. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00620.