Zhang Ren-Chao, Zhou Yu-Cheng, Mou Yi-Ping, Huang Chao-Jie, Jin Wei-Wei, Yan Jia-Fei, Wang Yong-Xiang, Liao Yi
Department of General Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 158 Shangtang Road, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang Province, China.
School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310029, Zhejiang Province, China.
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):2657-65. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4538-6. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
The studies comparing laparoscopic enucleation (LE) with open enucleation (OE) are limited. This study aimed to compare perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing LE and OE and to assess the pancreatic function after LE.
Between February 2001 and July 2014, patients who underwent enucleation were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups as LE and OE. Data considered for comparison analysis were patient demographics, intraoperative variables, morbidity, postoperative hospital stay, mortality, pathologic findings, and long-term follow-up (including pancreatic function).
Thirty-seven patients (15 LE and 22 OE) were included in the final analysis. Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. LE group showed significantly shorter operating time (118.2 ± 33.1 vs. 155.2 ± 44.3 min, p = 0.009), lower estimated blood loss (80.0 ± 71.2 vs. 195.5 ± 103.4 ml, p = 0.001), shorter first flatus time (1.8 ± 1.0 vs. 3.4 ± 1.8 days, p = 0.004), shorter diet start time (2.4 ± 1.0 vs. 4.4 ± 2.0 days, p = 0.001), shorter postoperative hospital stay (7.9 ± 3.4 vs. 11.2 ± 5.7 days, p = 0.046). Postoperative outcomes, including morbidity (40.0 vs. 45.5 %, p = 1.000), grade B/C pancreatic fistula rates (20.0 vs. 13.6 %, p = 0.874), and mortality, were similar in the two groups. The median follow-up period was 47 months (range 7-163 months). No local recurrence or distant metastasis was detected in either group. Only one patient (4.8 %) underwent OE developed new-onset diabetes, in comparison with none in the LE group. One patient (7.1 %) had weight loss and received pancreatic enzyme supplementation in the LE group, in comparison with two patients (9.5 %) in the OE group.
LE is a safe and feasible technique for the benign or low malignant-potential pancreatic neoplasms. Compared to OE, LE had shorter operating time, lower estimated blood loss, and faster recovery. LE could preserve the pancreatic function as the OE.
比较腹腔镜剜除术(LE)与开放性剜除术(OE)的研究有限。本研究旨在比较接受LE和OE的患者的围手术期结局,并评估LE术后的胰腺功能。
回顾2001年2月至2014年7月期间接受剜除术的患者。患者分为LE组和OE组。用于比较分析的数据包括患者人口统计学、术中变量、发病率、术后住院时间、死亡率、病理结果和长期随访(包括胰腺功能)。
最终分析纳入37例患者(15例LE和22例OE)。两组的基线特征相似。LE组的手术时间明显更短(118.2±33.1 vs. 155.2±44.3分钟,p = 0.009),估计失血量更低(80.0±71.2 vs. 195.5±103.4毫升,p = 0.001),首次排气时间更短(1.8±1.0 vs. 3.4±1.8天,p = 0.004),开始进食时间更短(2.4±1.0 vs. 4.4±2.0天,p = 0.001),术后住院时间更短(7.9±3.4 vs. 11.2±5.7天,p = 0.046)。两组的术后结局,包括发病率(40.0%对45.5%,p = 1.000)、B/C级胰瘘发生率(20.0%对13.6%,p = 0.874)和死亡率相似。中位随访期为47个月(范围7 - 163个月)。两组均未检测到局部复发或远处转移。仅1例接受OE的患者(4.8%)发生新发糖尿病,而LE组无。LE组1例患者(7.1%)体重减轻并接受胰酶补充,而OE组有2例患者(9.5%)。
LE是治疗良性或低恶性潜能胰腺肿瘤的一种安全可行的技术。与OE相比,LE的手术时间更短,估计失血量更低,恢复更快。LE与OE一样能保留胰腺功能。