Kinfe T M, Pintea B, Roeske S, Güresir Á, Güresir E, Vatter H
Division of Functional Neurosurgery, Stereotaxy and Neuromodulation, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Bonn Medical Center, Germany
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, RFW University, Germany.
Cephalalgia. 2016 Jul;36(8):779-89. doi: 10.1177/0333102415613765. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) has been reported to diminish pain levels in intractable chronic headache syndromes of different origin. No reliable objective markers exist to predict ONS responsiveness. This study investigated the predictive value of occipital percutaneous nerve field stimulation (PENS) prior to ONS.
This trial included 12 patients (CCH, CM, PTH, CH) with chronic refractory headache syndromes eligible for ONS. Repetitive PENS (3 × /10 days) was performed and the headache severity/frequency monitored over four weeks before ONS implantation. Further assessment of PENS/ONS outcomes were stimulation-related complications, perception/tolerance stimulation threshold, the Migraine Disability Scale (MIDAS) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI).
All PENS responders benefited from ONS. Of the seven PENS-nonresponders with VAS 6.1(±1.1), six experienced significant pain relief from ONS after three months and one patient failed the PENS/ONS trial (VAS 3.7 (±1.6)); (95% CI 3.6 to 5.7, p < 0.001). The VAS baseline was 8.4 (±0.5) and decreased significantly (50% reduction in severity/frequency) in five patients after PENS, while seven failed to improve (VAS 4.9 (±1.1); (95% CI 2.5 to 4.5, p < 0.001). BDI baseline (from 22.6 (±4.2) to 10.6 (±5.9) (95% CI 7.4 to 16.6, p < 0.001)) and MIDAS baseline (from 143.9 (±14.5) to 72.8 (±28.7) (95% CI 1.17 to 2.3, p < 0.001)) significantly declined after ONS. No PENS/ONS-related complications occurred.
Presurgical applied occipital PENS failed to identify ONS responders sufficiently according to our study protocol, thus requiring further specific investigations to determine its predictive usefulness.
据报道,枕神经刺激(ONS)可降低不同病因的顽固性慢性头痛综合征的疼痛程度。目前尚无可靠的客观指标来预测ONS的反应性。本研究调查了ONS之前枕部经皮神经场刺激(PENS)的预测价值。
本试验纳入了12例符合ONS治疗条件的慢性难治性头痛综合征患者(慢性丛集性头痛、慢性偏头痛、阵发性偏侧头痛、丛集性头痛)。进行了重复性PENS(每10天3次),并在植入ONS前四周监测头痛的严重程度/频率。对PENS/ONS结果的进一步评估包括刺激相关并发症、感觉/耐受刺激阈值、偏头痛残疾评定量表(MIDAS)和贝克抑郁量表(BDI)。
所有PENS反应者均从ONS中获益。在7例视觉模拟评分(VAS)为6.1(±1.1)的PENS无反应者中,6例在3个月后ONS治疗后疼痛显著缓解,1例患者PENS/ONS试验失败(VAS 3.7(±1.6));(95%可信区间3.6至5.7,p<0.001)。VAS基线为8.4(±0.5),5例患者在PENS治疗后显著下降(严重程度/频率降低50%),而7例患者未改善(VAS 4.9(±1.1);(95%可信区间2.5至4.5,p<0.001))。ONS治疗后BDI基线(从22.6(±4.2)降至10.6(±5.9)(95%可信区间7.4至16.6,p<0.001))和MIDAS基线(从143.9(±14.5)降至72.8(±28.7)(95%可信区间1.17至2.3,p<0.001))显著下降。未发生与PENS/ONS相关的并发症。
根据我们的研究方案,术前应用枕部PENS未能充分识别ONS反应者,因此需要进一步的具体研究来确定其预测效用。