Mehta Bijal K, Kamal Haris, McMurtray Aaron, Shafie Mohammed, Li Ping
Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center , Torrance, CA, USA.
Department of Neurology, Jacobs Neurological Institute, University at Buffalo , NY, USA.
Neurol Int. 2015 Sep 24;7(2):5807. doi: 10.4081/ni.2015.5807.
Anticoagulant use, such as heparin, is usually contraindicated in acute stroke patients. We present a study of patients, who were treated with intravenous heparin after a stroke that were also found to have an intraluminal thrombus. Prior studies imply that recanalization is achieved with heparin; however heparin should only prevent thrombus propagation. Therefore it is unclear whether and how IV heparin can achieve recanalization of intraluminal thrombi in acute stroke patients. A retrospective review of all acute stroke patients from a single stroke center who received a therapeutic IV heparin infusion from 5/2006 to 9/2011 were included in the study. We compared patients who had complete/partial recanalization and/or improved flow versus those that did not, with both these groups on a standard intravenous heparin infusion protocol. Demographic data was compared between the groups. Average partial thromboplastin time (PTT) during heparin infusion, time between computed tomography angiographies (CTAs), time from stroke onset to receiving IV heparin, and vessel occluded were also compared between groups. Forty-one patients (19 female, 22 male) were included in the study with a total of 55 vessels (either carotid, middle cerebral artery, anterior cerebral artery, posterior cerebral artery/posterior circulation) having intraluminal thrombi; 31 patients had 41 vessels with either partial or complete recanalization of effected vessels, while 10 patients had 14 vessels that did not have at least one vessel recanalize while on heparin. Using t-test we noted that the average PTT between the vessels that had partial/complete recanalization group (61.74) and nonrecanalization group (66.30) was not statistical significantly different (P=0.37).The average time in days on heparin between vascular imaging studies (CTA/conventional angiogram) in the group of vessels with partial/complete recanalization (7.12 days) and the ones with no change (6.11 days) was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.59). Patient's vessels receiving heparin for <24 hours versus those >24 hours did not significantly differ either (P=0.17). This study compares patient characteristics associated with recanalization of intraluminal thrombi in acute stroke patients on heparin. Recanalization of intraluminal thrombi are not associated with average PTT or duration on heparin.
抗凝剂的使用,如肝素,在急性中风患者中通常是禁忌的。我们开展了一项针对中风后接受静脉注射肝素治疗且同时发现存在管腔内血栓的患者的研究。先前的研究表明肝素可实现再通;然而肝素仅应防止血栓扩展。因此,尚不清楚静脉注射肝素能否以及如何在急性中风患者中实现管腔内血栓的再通。本研究纳入了对一家单一中风中心从2006年5月至2011年9月期间接受治疗性静脉注射肝素的所有急性中风患者的回顾性分析。我们将实现了完全/部分再通和/或血流改善的患者与未实现的患者进行了比较,这两组患者均采用标准静脉注射肝素输注方案。对两组之间的人口统计学数据进行了比较。还比较了肝素输注期间的平均部分凝血活酶时间(PTT)、计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)之间的时间、从中风发作到接受静脉注射肝素的时间以及闭塞的血管。该研究纳入了41例患者(19例女性,22例男性),共有55条血管(颈动脉、大脑中动脉、大脑前动脉、大脑后动脉/后循环)存在管腔内血栓;31例患者的41条血管实现了部分或完全再通,而10例患者的14条血管在使用肝素期间未实现至少一条血管再通。通过t检验,我们注意到部分/完全再通组血管(61.74)和未再通组血管(66.30)之间的平均PTT无统计学显著差异(P = 0.37)。部分/完全再通组血管(7.12天)和无变化组血管(6.11天)在血管成像研究(CTA/传统血管造影)之间使用肝素的平均天数在两组之间无显著差异(P = 0.59)。接受肝素治疗<24小时的患者血管与>24小时的患者血管之间也无显著差异(P = 0.17)。本研究比较了急性中风患者使用肝素后与管腔内血栓再通相关的患者特征。管腔内血栓的再通与平均PTT或肝素使用时长无关。