Suppr超能文献

静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂后,颈内动脉闭塞与大脑中动脉闭塞的临床及血管结局

Clinical and vascular outcome in internal carotid artery versus middle cerebral artery occlusions after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator.

作者信息

Linfante Italo, Llinas Rafael H, Selim Magdy, Chaves Claudia, Kumar Sandeep, Parker Robert A, Caplan Louis R, Schlaug Gottfried

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass 02115, USA.

出版信息

Stroke. 2002 Aug;33(8):2066-71. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000021001.18101.a5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Early reperfusion is a predictor of good outcome in acute ischemic stroke. We investigated whether middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusions have a better clinical outcome and proportion of recanalization compared with internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion after standard treatment with intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA).

PATIENTS

In a retrospective analysis of our prospective stroke database between January 7, 1998, and January 30, 2002, we identified 36 consecutive patients who were treated with IV tPA within 3 hours after symptom onset of a stroke in the distribution of a documented ICA or MCA occlusion. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was recorded before tPA, at 24 hours, 3 days, and 3 months after stroke. Three-month outcome was recorded by modified Rankin scale. Magnetic resonance angiography or computed tomographic angiography was obtained before tPA. The presence of recanalization was assessed by transcranial Doppler and/or magnetic resonance angiography within 3 days after stroke onset.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients had MCA occlusion, and 17 had ICA-plus-MCA occlusion before tPA. Although there was no difference in age and NIHSS at day 0 between the 2 groups, the MCA group had a lower day 3 NIHSS score compared with the ICA group (P=0.006) in an ANCOVA. In addition, patients who had a MCA occlusion had lower day 1 and 3 NIHSS scores compared with the ICA group (P=0.04 and P=0.03, respectively; Wilcoxon rank sum). Similarly, NIHSS was significantly lower in patients who recanalized on days 1 and 3 (P=0.004 and P=0.003 respectively, Wilcoxon rank sum). When we adjusted for NIHSS score at day 0 in an ANCOVA, the adjusted mean was lower in the group that recanalized compared with the group that did not recanalize (P<0.001). There was a significant difference between the proportion of recanalization in the MCA group (15 of 17 recanalized, 88%) at 3 days after tPA compared with that of the ICA group (5 of 16 recanalized, 31%; P=0.001, Fisher exact test). The 3-month modified Rankin scale was not different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite comparable age and NIHSS scores before IV tPA, MCA occlusions have lower day 1 and 3 NIHSS scores and higher proportion of recanalization compared with ICA occlusions. A combined IV/intra-arterial or mechanical thrombolysis may be needed to achieve early recanalization in ICA occlusions.

摘要

背景与目的

早期再灌注是急性缺血性卒中良好预后的预测指标。我们研究了在静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)标准治疗后,大脑中动脉(MCA)闭塞与颈内动脉(ICA)闭塞相比,是否具有更好的临床结局和再通比例。

患者

在对我们前瞻性卒中数据库1998年1月7日至2002年1月30日期间进行的一项回顾性分析中,我们确定了36例连续患者,他们在记录为ICA或MCA闭塞分布区域的卒中症状发作后3小时内接受了静脉tPA治疗。在tPA治疗前、卒中后24小时、3天和3个月记录美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分。通过改良Rankin量表记录3个月的结局。在tPA治疗前进行磁共振血管造影或计算机断层血管造影。在卒中发作后3天内通过经颅多普勒和/或磁共振血管造影评估再通情况。

结果

19例患者在tPA治疗前有MCA闭塞,17例有ICA加MCA闭塞。虽然两组在第0天的年龄和NIHSS评分无差异,但在协方差分析中,MCA组第3天的NIHSS评分低于ICA组(P = 0.006)。此外,与ICA组相比,MCA闭塞患者第1天和第3天的NIHSS评分更低(分别为P = 0.04和P = 0.03;Wilcoxon秩和检验)。同样,在第1天和第3天再通的患者NIHSS评分显著更低(分别为P = 0.004和P = 0.003,Wilcoxon秩和检验)。在协方差分析中,当我们对第0天的NIHSS评分进行调整时,再通组的调整均值低于未再通组(P < 0.001)。tPA治疗后3天,MCA组的再通比例(17例中有15例再通,88%)与ICA组(16例中有5例再通,31%;P = 0.001,Fisher精确检验)相比有显著差异。两组之间3个月的改良Rankin量表评分无差异。

结论

尽管在静脉tPA治疗前年龄和NIHSS评分相当,但与ICA闭塞相比,MCA闭塞第1天和第3天的NIHSS评分更低,再通比例更高。对于ICA闭塞,可能需要联合静脉/动脉内或机械溶栓以实现早期再通。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验