Suppr超能文献

FRAX与不依赖骨密度的骨折预测

FRAX and fracture prediction without bone mineral density.

作者信息

Kanis J A, Harvey N C, Johansson H, Odén A, Leslie W D, McCloskey E V

机构信息

a Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School , UK ;

b MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton , Southampton , UK ;

出版信息

Climacteric. 2015;18 Suppl 2:2-9. doi: 10.3109/13697137.2015.1092342. Epub 2015 Oct 21.

Abstract

The major application of FRAX in osteoporosis is to direct pharmacological interventions to those at high risk of fracture. Whereas the efficacy of osteoporosis treatment, with the possible exception of alendronate, is largely independent of baseline bone mineral density (BMD), it remains a widely held perception that osteoporosis therapies are only effective in the presence of low BMD. Thus, the use of FRAX in the absence of BMD to identify individuals requiring therapy remains the subject of some debate and is the focus of this review. The clinical risk factors used in FRAX have high evidence-based validity to identify a risk responsive to intervention. The selection of high-risk individuals with FRAX, without knowledge of BMD, preferentially selects for low BMD and thus identifies a risk that is responsive to pharmacological intervention. The prediction of fractures with the use of clinical risk factors alone in FRAX is comparable to the use of BMD alone to predict fractures and is suitable, therefore, in the many countries where facilities for BMD testing are sparse. In countries where access to BMD is greater, FRAX can be used without BMD in the majority of cases and BMD tests reserved for those close to a probability-based intervention threshold. Thus concerns surrounding the use of FRAX in clinical practice without information on BMD are largely misplaced.

摘要

FRAX在骨质疏松症中的主要应用是将药物干预指向骨折高风险人群。除阿仑膦酸盐可能为例外,骨质疏松症治疗的疗效在很大程度上独立于基线骨密度(BMD),但人们仍普遍认为骨质疏松症疗法仅在低骨密度情况下才有效。因此,在没有骨密度检测结果时使用FRAX来识别需要治疗的个体仍然存在一些争议,也是本综述的重点。FRAX中使用的临床风险因素在识别对干预有反应的风险方面具有高度的循证有效性。在不了解骨密度的情况下,使用FRAX选择高风险个体,优先选择低骨密度个体,从而识别出对药物干预有反应的风险。仅使用临床风险因素在FRAX中预测骨折与仅使用骨密度预测骨折相当,因此适用于许多骨密度检测设施稀少的国家。在更容易获得骨密度检测的国家,大多数情况下可以在不检测骨密度的情况下使用FRAX,而骨密度检测则保留给那些接近基于概率的干预阈值的人群。因此,在临床实践中在没有骨密度信息的情况下使用FRAX的担忧在很大程度上是没有根据的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验