• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同阴道分娩方式的初产妇产科肛门括约肌损伤率。

Obstetric anal sphincter injury rates among primiparous women with different modes of vaginal delivery.

作者信息

Ampt Amanda J, Patterson Jillian A, Roberts Christine L, Ford Jane B

机构信息

Clinical and Population Perinatal Health Research, The Kolling Institute, Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.

Clinical and Population Perinatal Health Research, The Kolling Institute, Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Dec;131(3):260-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.025. Epub 2015 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.025
PMID:26489488
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether rates of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) are continuing to increase and whether risk of OASIS according to mode of delivery is constant over time.

METHODS

In a retrospective population-based study, data were obtained for vaginal singleton vertex deliveries at 37-41 weeks of pregnancy among primiparous women in New South Wales, Australia, between January 2001 and December 2011. Annual OASIS rates were determined among non-instrumental, forceps, and vacuum deliveries with and without episiotomy. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine adjusted odds ratios for each delivery mode category by year. Trends in adjusted odds ratios over time for each delivery category were compared.

RESULTS

OASIS occurred in 955 (4.1%) of 23 081 deliveries in 2001 and 1487 (5.9%) of 25 081 deliveries in 2011. After adjustment for known risk factors, the only delivery categories to show statistically significant increases in OASIS over the study period were non-instrumental deliveries without episiotomy (linear trend P<0.001) and forceps deliveries with episiotomy (linear trend P=0.004).

CONCLUSION

Overall, OASIS rates have continued to increase. Known risk factors do not fully explain the increase in OASIS rates in non-instrumental deliveries without an episiotomy and in forceps deliveries with an episiotomy.

摘要

目的

确定产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIS)的发生率是否持续上升,以及根据分娩方式划分的OASIS风险是否随时间保持不变。

方法

在一项基于人群的回顾性研究中,获取了2001年1月至2011年12月期间澳大利亚新南威尔士州初产妇妊娠37 - 41周单胎头位阴道分娩的数据。确定了有无会阴切开术的非器械助产、产钳助产和真空吸引助产的年度OASIS发生率。采用多变量逻辑回归确定每年每种分娩方式类别的调整比值比。比较了各分娩类别调整比值比随时间的变化趋势。

结果

2001年23081例分娩中有955例(4.1%)发生OASIS,2011年25081例分娩中有1487例(5.9%)发生OASIS。在对已知风险因素进行调整后,研究期间OASIS发生率有统计学显著增加的唯一分娩类别是非器械助产且无会阴切开术(线性趋势P<0.001)和产钳助产且有会阴切开术(线性趋势P = 0.004)。

结论

总体而言,OASIS发生率持续上升。已知风险因素不能完全解释非器械助产且无会阴切开术以及产钳助产且有会阴切开术的OASIS发生率增加的情况。

相似文献

1
Obstetric anal sphincter injury rates among primiparous women with different modes of vaginal delivery.不同阴道分娩方式的初产妇产科肛门括约肌损伤率。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Dec;131(3):260-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.025. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
2
The effectiveness of mediolateral episiotomy in preventing obstetric anal sphincter injuries during operative vaginal delivery: a ten-year analysis of a national registry.会阴侧切术在预防阴道助产分娩时产科肛门括约肌损伤中的有效性:一项基于国家登记处的十年分析
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Mar;29(3):407-413. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3422-4. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
3
Modifiable risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women: a population-based cohort study.初产妇产科肛门括约肌损伤的可改变危险因素:基于人群的队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;210(1):59.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.043. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
4
Impact of Episiotomy During Operative Vaginal Delivery on Obstetrical Anal Sphincter Injuries.手术阴道分娩时会阴切开术对产科肛门括约肌损伤的影响。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Dec;41(12):1734-1741. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.02.016. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
5
Risk factors for obstetrical anal sphincter lacerations.产科肛门括约肌裂伤的危险因素。
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005 Jul-Aug;16(4):304-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-005-1297-2. Epub 2005 Apr 5.
6
Factors associated with obstetric anal sphincter injuries during vacuum delivery among Chinese women.中国女性在使用真空吸引器分娩时发生产科肛门括约肌损伤的相关因素。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Jun;145(3):354-360. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12813. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
7
Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery.会阴侧切术可降低阴道助产分娩时肛门括约肌损伤的风险。
BJOG. 2008 Jan;115(1):104-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01554.x. Epub 2007 Nov 12.
8
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries among women with gestational diabetes and women without gestational diabetes: A NSW population-based cohort study.妊娠期糖尿病女性与非妊娠期糖尿病女性的产科肛门括约肌损伤:一项基于新南威尔士州人群的队列研究。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Oct;59(5):662-669. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12950. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
9
Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) at a tertiary centre in south India.印度南部一家三级医疗中心产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)的危险因素。
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Mar;29(3):391-396. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3398-0. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
10
Episiotomy use among vaginal deliveries and the association with anal sphincter injury: a population-based retrospective cohort study.会阴切开术在阴道分娩中的应用及其与肛门括约肌损伤的关系:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
CMAJ. 2019 Oct 21;191(42):E1149-E1158. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.190366.

引用本文的文献

1
Asian-White disparities in obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.产科肛门括约肌损伤的亚洲人与白人差异:系统评价与荟萃分析。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2023 Dec 10;4(1):100296. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100296. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Three-Dimensional Transperineal Ultrasound Guiding Early Secondary Repair of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury in an Incontinent Patient without Suture Dehiscence.三维经会阴超声引导下对一名无缝线裂开的大便失禁患者进行产科肛门括约肌损伤的早期二期修复
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Dec 27;14(1):68. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14010068.
3
Level of episiotomy practice and its disparity among primiparous and multiparous women in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
埃塞俄比亚初产妇和经产妇会阴切开术的实施水平及其差异:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 Nov 6;4:1153640. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1153640. eCollection 2023.
4
Asian-white disparities in obstetric anal sphincter injury: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.亚洲-白种人在产科肛门括约肌损伤方面的差异:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 8;18(9):e0291174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291174. eCollection 2023.
5
Berlin survey on obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI).柏林产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)调查。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Oct;306(4):1117-1125. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06627-9. Epub 2022 Jun 4.
6
How to do it: delayed sphincteroplasty for obstetric anal sphincter injury.操作方法:产科肛门括约肌损伤的延迟括约肌成形术。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 May;92(5):1208-1210. doi: 10.1111/ans.17650. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
7
Women's experiences of the OASI Care Bundle; a package of care to reduce severe perineal trauma.女性对 OASI 护理包的体验;减少严重会阴创伤的护理包。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jul;32(7):1807-1816. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04653-2. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
8
Impact of a quality improvement project to reduce the rate of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a multicentre study with a stepped-wedge design.质量改进项目对降低产科肛门括约肌损伤率的影响:一项采用多中心、阶梯式设计的研究。
BJOG. 2021 Feb;128(3):584-592. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16396. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
9
Exploring clinicians' perspectives on the 'Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury Care Bundle' national quality improvement programme: a qualitative study.探索临床医生对“产科肛门括约肌损伤护理包”国家质量改进计划的看法:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 9;10(9):e035674. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035674.
10
Anal incontinence and unrecognized anal sphincter injuries after vaginal delivery- a cross-sectional study in Norway.阴道分娩后肛门失禁和未被识别的肛门括约肌损伤-挪威的一项横断面研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2020 Jun 22;20(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-00989-5.