Stolk Wilma A, Walker Martin, Coffeng Luc E, Basáñez María-Gloria, de Vlas Sake J
Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
London Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Parasit Vectors. 2015 Oct 22;8:552. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-1159-9.
The World Health Organization (WHO) has set ambitious targets for the elimination of onchocerciasis by 2020-2025 through mass ivermectin treatment. Two different mathematical models have assessed the feasibility of reaching this goal for different settings and treatment scenarios, namely the individual-based microsimulation model ONCHOSIM and the population-based deterministic model EPIONCHO. In this study, we harmonize some crucial assumptions and compare model predictions on common outputs.
Using a range of initial endemicity levels and treatment scenarios, we compared the models with respect to the following outcomes: 1) model-predicted trends in microfilarial (mf) prevalence and mean mf intensity during 25 years of (annual or biannual) mass ivermectin treatment; 2) treatment duration needed to bring mf prevalence below a provisional operational threshold for treatment interruption (pOTTIS, i.e. 1.4 %), and 3) treatment duration needed to drive the parasite population to local elimination, even in the absence of further interventions. Local elimination was judged by stochastic fade-out in ONCHOSIM and by reaching transmission breakpoints in EPIONCHO.
ONCHOSIM and EPIONCHO both predicted that in mesoendemic areas the pOTTIS can be reached with annual treatment, but that this strategy may be insufficient in very highly hyperendemic areas or would require prolonged continuation of treatment. For the lower endemicity levels explored, ONCHOSIM predicted that the time needed to reach the pOTTIS is longer than that needed to drive the parasite population to elimination, whereas for the higher endemicity levels the opposite was true. In EPIONCHO, the pOTTIS was reached consistently sooner than the breakpoint.
The operational thresholds proposed by APOC may have to be adjusted to adequately reflect differences in pre-control endemicities. Further comparative modelling work will be conducted to better understand the main causes of differences in model-predicted trends. This is a pre-requisite for guiding elimination programmes in Africa and refining operational criteria for stopping mass treatment.
世界卫生组织(WHO)制定了宏伟目标,要在2020 - 2025年通过大规模伊维菌素治疗消除盘尾丝虫病。两种不同的数学模型评估了在不同环境和治疗方案下实现这一目标的可行性,即基于个体的微观模拟模型ONCHOSIM和基于群体的确定性模型EPIONCHO。在本研究中,我们协调了一些关键假设,并比较了模型对共同输出结果的预测。
使用一系列初始流行程度水平和治疗方案,我们就以下结果对模型进行了比较:1)在(每年或每两年一次)大规模伊维菌素治疗的25年期间,模型预测的微丝蚴(mf)流行率和平均mf强度趋势;2)将mf流行率降至治疗中断的临时操作阈值(pOTTIS,即1.4%)所需的治疗持续时间,以及3)即使在没有进一步干预的情况下,将寄生虫种群驱至局部消除所需的治疗持续时间。在ONCHOSIM中通过随机消失判断局部消除,在EPIONCHO中通过达到传播断点判断局部消除。
ONCHOSIM和EPIONCHO均预测,在中度流行地区,每年治疗可达到pOTTIS,但在高度高度流行地区该策略可能不足,或者需要延长治疗持续时间。对于所探索的较低流行程度水平,ONCHOSIM预测达到pOTTIS所需的时间比将寄生虫种群驱至消除所需的时间长,而对于较高流行程度水平则相反。在EPIONCHO中,达到pOTTIS的时间始终早于断点。
消灭盘尾丝虫病非洲方案(APOC)提出的操作阈值可能必须进行调整,以充分反映控制前流行程度的差异。将开展进一步的比较建模工作,以更好地理解模型预测趋势差异的主要原因。这是指导非洲消除计划和完善停止大规模治疗操作标准的先决条件。