Agrusa Antonino, Frazzetta Giuseppe, Chianetta Daniela, Di Giovanni Silvia, Gulotta Leonardo, Di Buno Giuseppe, Sorce Vincenzo, Romano Giorgio, Gulotta Gaspare
Dipartimento di Chirurgia Generale e d'Urgenza, Policlinico Universitario "Paolo Giaccone", Palermo, 90121, Sicily, Italy.
Ospedale "Michele Chiello", Unità Operativa Complessa di Chirurgia Generale e d'Urgenza, ASP n° 4 Contrada Bellia, 94015, Piazza Armerina, Sicily, Italy.
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):2804-10. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4558-2. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Laparotomy has been the approach of choice for re-operations in patients with surgical complications. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the feasibility and the safety of laparoscopic approach for the management of general abdominal surgery complications.
We report a retrospective review of 75 patients who underwent laparoscopic evaluation for postoperative complications over a 4-year period. Primary outcomes (resolution rate by exclusive laparoscopic approach, conversion rate, further surgery rate) and secondary outcomes (mortality, hospitalization, prolonged ileus, wounds problems and median operative time) were evaluated.
Sixty-six patients (88 %) were managed with laparoscopic approach without conversion; of these, sixty-three patients (84 %) had no more or further complications and were discharged from hospital between 4 ± 3 days after "second-look" surgery; three patients (4 %) developed postoperative complications requiring a third surgery. Nine cases (12 %) underwent conversion in open surgery after laparoscopic approach. Two elderly patients (2.7 %) died in intensive care unit, because of multi-organ failure syndrome. Median time elapsed between an intervention and another was about 2.5 ± 9.5 days. Mean operative time was 90 ± 150 min. Postoperative hospital stay was between 4.5 and 18 days.
Laparoscopy has begun to be the preferred method to manage postoperative problems, but only few reports are available actually. Our experience in "relaparoscopic" management of surgical complications seems to suggest that laparoscopy "second look" is an effective tool after open or laparoscopic surgery for the management of postoperative complications and it may avoid diagnostic delay and further laparotomy and related problems.
背景/目的:剖腹手术一直是外科并发症患者再次手术的首选方法。本回顾性分析的目的是评估腹腔镜手术治疗普通腹部外科并发症的可行性和安全性。
我们回顾性分析了75例在4年期间因术后并发症接受腹腔镜评估的患者。评估主要结局(单纯腹腔镜手术的解决率、中转率、再次手术率)和次要结局(死亡率、住院时间、肠梗阻延长、伤口问题及中位手术时间)。
66例患者(88%)采用腹腔镜手术治疗,未中转;其中,63例患者(84%)未出现更多或进一步的并发症,在“二次探查”手术后4±3天出院;3例患者(4%)出现术后并发症,需要进行第三次手术。9例患者(12%)在腹腔镜手术后中转开腹手术。2例老年患者(2.7%)在重症监护病房因多器官功能衰竭综合征死亡。两次干预之间的中位时间间隔约为2.5±9.5天。平均手术时间为90±150分钟。术后住院时间为4.5至18天。
腹腔镜检查已开始成为处理术后问题的首选方法,但目前实际报道较少。我们在手术并发症“再次腹腔镜手术”管理方面的经验似乎表明,腹腔镜“二次探查”是开放手术或腹腔镜手术后处理术后并发症的有效工具,它可以避免诊断延迟以及进一步的剖腹手术和相关问题。