Quintana-Bárcena Patricia, Lord Anne, Lizotte Annie, Berbiche Djamal, Jouini Ghaya, Lalonde Lyne
Patricia Quintana-Bárcena, B.Pharm., is Ph.D. Student, Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal (UM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Anne Lord, M.Sc., is Clinical Pharmacist; and Annie Lizotte, M.Sc., is Clinical Pharmacist, Centre de Santé et de Services Sociaux de Laval, Laval, Quebec. Djamal Berbiche, Ph.D., is Statistician; and Ghaya Jouini, M.Sc., is Research Coordinator, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier, UM. Lyne Lalonde, Ph.D., is Professor, Faculty of Pharmacy, UM, and Researcher, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier, UM.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015 Nov 1;72(21):1876-84. doi: 10.2146/ajhp140765.
The development and validation of criteria for classifying severity of drug-related problems (DRPs) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the community pharmacy setting are described.
The Severity Categorization for Pharmaceutical Evaluation (SCOPE) criteria were adapted from an existing tool based on the interventions required to manage DRPs in community pharmacy. Ten community pharmacists reviewed the criteria. An expert panel involving community pharmacists, hospital pharmacists, family physicians, and nephrologists scored the relevance of each criterion. The severity of 487 DRPs identified among 168 patients was rated independently by two evaluators and by one evaluator on two occasions. Kappa reliability coefficients were computed. Severity as assessed by implicit judgment and the SCOPE criteria was compared.
Three severity categories were defined (mild, moderate, and severe), each including two levels (for a total of six levels). At each level, specific interventions required to manage DRPs in community pharmacy were listed. The test-retest reliability coefficient by level was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.90), and the interrater reliability coefficient was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.72-0.82). The test-retest coefficient by category was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.84-0.95), and the interrater coefficient was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.86-0.94). A higher level of SCOPE was associated with more severe DRPs as rated by implicit judgment (p < 0.05).
A set of criteria developed for use in the community pharmacy setting for evaluating the severity of DRPs in CKD proved to be reliable and correlated with clinical implicit judgment.
描述在社区药房环境中用于对慢性肾脏病(CKD)药物相关问题(DRP)严重程度进行分类的标准的制定和验证。
药物评估严重程度分类(SCOPE)标准改编自一种基于社区药房管理DRP所需干预措施的现有工具。十名社区药剂师对该标准进行了审查。一个由社区药剂师、医院药剂师、家庭医生和肾病学家组成的专家小组对每个标准的相关性进行了评分。两名评估人员以及一名评估人员在两个不同时间分别对168例患者中识别出的487个DRP的严重程度进行了独立评级。计算了kappa可靠性系数。比较了通过隐性判断评估的严重程度和SCOPE标准。
定义了三个严重程度类别(轻度、中度和重度),每个类别包括两个级别(共六个级别)。在每个级别,列出了社区药房管理DRP所需的具体干预措施。按级别计算的重测可靠性系数为0.85(95%置信区间[CI],0.79 - 0.90),评估者间可靠性系数为0.77(95%CI,0.72 - 0.82)。按类别计算的重测系数为0.89(95%CI,0.84 - 0.95),评估者间系数为0.90(95%CI,0.86 - 0.94)。如通过隐性判断所评级的,较高的SCOPE级别与更严重的DRP相关(p < 0.05)。
为社区药房环境中评估CKD中DRP严重程度而制定的一套标准被证明是可靠的,并且与临床隐性判断相关。