Eroglu Cennet Neslihan, Tunç Serap Keskin, Elasan Sadi
1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yuzuncu Yil University Faculty of Dentistry , Van, Turkey .
2 Department of Biostatistics, Yuzuncu Yil University Faculty of Medicine , Van, Turkey .
Photomed Laser Surg. 2015 Nov;33(11):533-9. doi: 10.1089/pho.2014.3856. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
The present study aimed to compare clinical outcomes during the recovery period after soft tissue surgery performed by an erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser with those after surgery with the conventional method, in which a scalpel was used.
A total of 44 epulis fissuratum removal surgeries were performed in 30 healthy volunteers using either an Er,Cr:YSGG laser (laser group) or a scalpel (conventional group), with the same number of lesions in each group. Both groups were controlled postoperatively on days 2, 7, 14, and 30. The visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores of the patients and healing, erythema, and suppuration in the surgical area were recorded with scores between 0 and 3. Total wound surface was measured by a ruler according to the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool.
The results of the present study demonstrated that there were no significant differences between the conventional group using analgesic and the laser group in terms of the VAS scores (p = 0.744) and edema (p = 0.206). Evaluation of wound surface revealed healing without any problem as of the 2nd day at a rate of 82% in the laser group and 59% in the conventional group.
In conclusion, Er,Cr:YSGG laser was superior to scalpel regarding clinical outcomes, and led to a difference in the use of analgesic and local anesthetic.
本研究旨在比较铒铬:钇钪镓石榴石(Er,Cr:YSGG)激光软组织手术后恢复期与传统手术刀手术后的临床结果。
对30名健康志愿者进行了44例龈裂性龈瘤切除术,分别使用Er,Cr:YSGG激光(激光组)或手术刀(传统组),每组的病变数量相同。两组均在术后第2、7、14和30天进行对照。记录患者的视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分以及手术区域的愈合、红斑和化脓情况,评分范围为0至3分。根据贝茨-詹森伤口评估工具用尺子测量伤口总面积。
本研究结果表明,使用镇痛药的传统组与激光组在VAS评分(p = 0.744)和水肿(p = 0.206)方面无显著差异。伤口表面评估显示,激光组在第2天的愈合率为82%,传统组为59%,均无任何问题。
总之,Er,Cr:YSGG激光在临床结果方面优于手术刀,并且在镇痛药和局部麻醉药的使用上存在差异。