Murphy Caitlin C, Sandler Robert S, Grubber Janet M, Johnson Marcus R, Fisher Deborah A
Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Mar;14(3):436-444.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Regular screening with colonoscopy lowers colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. We aimed to determine patterns of repeat and surveillance colonoscopy and identify factors associated with overuse and underuse of colonoscopy.
We analyzed data from participants in a previous Veterans Health Administration (VHA) study who underwent outpatient colonoscopy at 25 VHA facilities between October 2007 and September 2008 (n = 1455). The proportion of patients who received a follow-up colonoscopy was calculated for 3 risk groups, which were defined on the basis of the index colonoscopy: no adenoma, low-risk adenoma, or high-risk adenoma.
Colonoscopy was overused (used more frequently than intervals recommended by guidelines) by 16% of patients with no adenomas, 26% with low-risk adenomas, and 29% with high-risk adenomas. Most patients with high-risk adenomas (54%) underwent colonoscopy after the recommended interval or did not undergo colonoscopy. Patients who received a follow-up recommendation that was discordant with guidelines were more likely to undergo colonoscopy too early (no adenoma odds ratio [OR], 3.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.31-6.25 and low-risk adenoma OR, 5.28; 95% CI, 1.88-14.83). Receipt of colonoscopy at nonacademic facilities was associated with overuse among patients without adenomas (OR, 5.26; 95% CI, 1.96-14.29) or with low-risk adenomas (OR, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.52-7.69). Performance of colonoscopies by general surgeons vs gastroenterologists (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.02-4.23) and female sex of the patient (OR, 3.28; 95% CI, 1.06-10.16) were associated with overuse of colonoscopy for patients with low-risk adenomas. No factors examined were associated with underuse of colonoscopy among patients with high-risk adenomas.
In an analysis of patients in the VHA system, more than one fourth of patients with low-risk adenomas received follow-up colonoscopies too early, whereas more than one half of those with high-risk adenomas did not undergo surveillance colonoscopy as recommended. Our findings highlight the need for system-level improvements to facilitate the appropriate delivery of colonoscopy that is based on individual risk.
定期进行结肠镜检查可降低结直肠癌的发病率和死亡率。我们旨在确定重复结肠镜检查和监测结肠镜检查的模式,并识别与结肠镜检查过度使用和使用不足相关的因素。
我们分析了先前退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)研究中参与者的数据,这些参与者于2007年10月至2008年9月期间在25个VHA机构接受了门诊结肠镜检查(n = 1455)。根据首次结肠镜检查结果将患者分为3个风险组,计算了接受后续结肠镜检查的患者比例:无腺瘤、低风险腺瘤或高风险腺瘤。
无腺瘤患者中有16%、低风险腺瘤患者中有26%、高风险腺瘤患者中有29%的结肠镜检查存在过度使用情况(使用频率高于指南推荐的间隔时间)。大多数高风险腺瘤患者(54%)在推荐间隔时间之后才接受结肠镜检查或未接受结肠镜检查。收到与指南不一致的后续检查建议的患者更有可能过早接受结肠镜检查(无腺瘤优势比[OR]为3.80;95%置信区间[CI]为2.31 - 6.25;低风险腺瘤OR为5.28;95%CI为1.88 - 14.83)。在非学术机构接受结肠镜检查与无腺瘤患者(OR为5.26;95%CI为1.96 - 14.29)或低风险腺瘤患者(OR为3.45;95%CI为1.52 - 7.69)的过度使用相关。普通外科医生与胃肠病学家进行结肠镜检查(OR为2.08;95%CI为1.02 - 4.23)以及患者为女性(OR为3.28;95%CI为1.06 - 10.16)与低风险腺瘤患者结肠镜检查的过度使用相关。在高风险腺瘤患者中,所检查的因素均与结肠镜检查使用不足无关。
在对VHA系统中的患者进行的分析中,超过四分之一的低风险腺瘤患者过早接受了后续结肠镜检查,而超过一半的高风险腺瘤患者未按推荐进行监测结肠镜检查。我们的研究结果凸显了在系统层面进行改进的必要性,以促进基于个体风险的结肠镜检查的合理实施。