Allen Nathan Gold, Khan Jeffrey Steven, Alzahri Mohammad Shami, Stolar Andrea Gail
Section of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, Center for Medical Ethics & Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Suite 310D, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, BCM350, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2015 Nov;33(4):863-74. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
The care of patients with a psychiatric emergency is fraught with ethical challenges. Applying ethical reasoning to clinical challenges may help to improve care. Emergency providers should assess decision-making capacity using 4 criteria: communication, understanding, appreciation, and reasoning. Maintaining patient confidentiality is a strong imperative for emergency physicians and should be protected unless compelling additional concerns take precedence. The goal of involuntary treatment should be to protect patients from harm that they would not be exposed to were they capable of autonomous decision making, not dangerous, or not impaired by their psychiatric illness using the least restrictive means possible.
精神病紧急情况患者的护理充满了伦理挑战。将伦理推理应用于临床挑战可能有助于改善护理。急诊医护人员应使用四个标准评估决策能力:沟通、理解、领会和推理。对急诊医生来说,维护患者的隐私至关重要,除非有令人信服的其他优先考虑因素,否则应予以保护。非自愿治疗的目标应该是保护患者免受伤害,这些伤害是他们在能够自主决策、没有危险或未受精神疾病影响的情况下不会面临的,并且应尽可能采用限制最小的方式。