Adachi Hidemitsu, Mineharu Yohei, Ishikawa Tatsuya, Imamura Hirotoshi, Yamamoto Shiro, Todo Kenichi, Yamagami Hiroshi, Sakai Nobuyuki
Comprehensive Stroke Center, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
Comprehensive Stroke Center, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan Division of Neuroendovascular Therapy, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation, Kobe, Japan.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2015 Dec;21(6):719-23. doi: 10.1177/1591019915609120. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
Endovascular treatment for superior sagittal sinus (SSS) thrombosis is not always successful because of difficult access and long thrombus lesions. We report the first two cases of patients with acute cerebral venous sinus thrombosis at the SSS that was not recanalized by anticoagulation, mechanical thrombectomy, or thrombolysis, but was successfully treated by stent placement. Case 1 was a 37-year-old woman with bilateral subdural hematomas. Digital subtraction angiography showed obstruction of the sinus from the SSS to the right transverse sinus. Recanalization was achieved by selective thrombolysis using urokinase followed by balloon angioplasty, but re-occlusion occurred on the next day of treatment. Repeated endovascular treatment including balloon angioplasty, thrombus aspiration and thrombolysis using recombinant tissue plasminogen activator failed to achieve recanalization. We thus placed intracranial stents in the SSS, which did achieve recanalization. Case 2 was a 69-year-old woman with a small infarction in the left parietal lobe. Digital subtraction angiography showed sinus obliteration from the SSS to the bilateral transverse sinuses. Recanalization was not achieved by balloon angioplasty, thrombus aspiration and selective thrombolysis. We thus placed intracranial stents in the SSS, which did achieve recanalization. Postoperative course was uneventful in both cases and venous sinus patency was confirmed by venography >1.5 years after treatment. When conventional endovascular strategies have been unsuccessful, placement of intracranial stents, which can easily gain access to the distal part of the SSS as compared with carotid stents, may be a useful treatment option for the acute sinus thrombosis in this region.
由于入路困难和血栓病变较长,上矢状窦(SSS)血栓形成的血管内治疗并不总是成功的。我们报告了首例两例急性脑静脉窦血栓形成患者,其位于SSS,经抗凝、机械取栓或溶栓治疗后未再通,但通过支架置入成功治愈。病例1为一名37岁双侧硬膜下血肿女性。数字减影血管造影显示从SSS至右侧横窦的窦道阻塞。通过使用尿激酶进行选择性溶栓,随后进行球囊血管成形术实现了再通,但在治疗的第二天再次闭塞。包括球囊血管成形术、血栓抽吸和使用重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂进行溶栓在内的重复血管内治疗未能实现再通。因此,我们在SSS中置入了颅内支架,确实实现了再通。病例2为一名69岁左侧顶叶小梗死女性。数字减影血管造影显示从SSS至双侧横窦的窦道闭塞。球囊血管成形术、血栓抽吸和选择性溶栓均未实现再通。因此,我们在SSS中置入了颅内支架,确实实现了再通。两例患者术后病程均顺利,治疗后>1.5年通过静脉造影证实静脉窦通畅。当传统血管内策略失败时,与颈动脉支架相比,能够轻松进入SSS远端的颅内支架置入可能是该区域急性窦血栓形成的一种有用治疗选择。