Lu Guangdong, Shin Jae Ho, Song Yunsun, Lee Deok Hee
Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2019 Dec;25(6):714-720. doi: 10.1177/1591019919852168. Epub 2019 May 27.
Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy for the treatment of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis is not always successful. We present our experience of using self-expanding stents to facilitate effective recanalization of persistent lateral sinus thrombosis refractory to endovascular mechanical thrombectomy.
Data from patients who underwent endovascular mechanical thrombectomy for the treatment of acute symptomatic cerebral venous sinus thrombosis between August 2015 and July 2018 were evaluated. Patient demographics, procedural techniques, devices used and follow-up outcomes were assessed.
A total of 14 patients underwent endovascular mechanical thrombectomy during the study period. Of these, stenting of the occluded sinus was performed in five patients with extensive sinus thrombosis after conventional endovascular mechanical thrombectomy. Three of the five patients had a variable degree of venous infarction and/or hemorrhage before treatment. The target lesion was located in the right lateral sinus in all five patients. Due to the length of the involved sinus, two stents were required in one patient and three stents in two patients. The only procedure-related complication was an asymptomatic tearing of the sinus wall in one patient. Stent patency could not be maintained in two patients due to stent buckling within the jugular foramen segment and an inability to maintain antiplatelet medication. Modified Rankin Scale scores at 2-16 months were zero in two patients, one in two patients, and five in one patient.
Stenting for the thrombotic occlusion of the lateral sinus is a feasible rescue method to overcome unsuccessful endovascular mechanical thrombectomy. However, currently available stenting systems may be unsuitable for use in the intracranial dural sinus system.
血管内机械取栓治疗脑静脉窦血栓形成并非总能成功。我们介绍了使用自膨式支架促进对血管内机械取栓难治的持续性外侧窦血栓形成有效再通的经验。
对2015年8月至2018年7月期间接受血管内机械取栓治疗急性症状性脑静脉窦血栓形成的患者数据进行评估。评估患者人口统计学、手术技术、使用的器械和随访结果。
在研究期间,共有14例患者接受了血管内机械取栓。其中,5例广泛窦血栓形成患者在传统血管内机械取栓后对闭塞窦进行了支架置入。5例患者中有3例在治疗前有不同程度的静脉梗死和/或出血。所有5例患者的目标病变均位于右侧外侧窦。由于受累窦的长度,1例患者需要2个支架,2例患者需要3个支架。唯一与手术相关的并发症是1例患者出现无症状的窦壁撕裂。2例患者由于颈静脉孔段内支架弯曲和无法维持抗血小板药物治疗而未能维持支架通畅。2至16个月时改良Rankin量表评分,2例患者为0分,2例患者为1分,1例患者为5分。
外侧窦血栓闭塞的支架置入是克服血管内机械取栓失败的一种可行的挽救方法。然而,目前可用的支架系统可能不适用于颅内硬脑膜窦系统。