Yu Lifeng, Fletcher Joel G, Shiung Maria, Thomas Kristen B, Matsumoto Jane M, Zingula Shannon N, McCollough Cynthia H
1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Nov;205(5):1026-37. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.14185.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the radiation dose reduction potential of a novel image-based denoising technique in pediatric abdominopelvic and chest CT examinations and compare it with a commercial iterative reconstruction method.
Data were retrospectively collected from 50 (25 abdominopelvic and 25 chest) clinically indicated pediatric CT examinations. For each examination, a validated noise-insertion tool was used to simulate half-dose data, which were reconstructed using filtered back-projection (FBP) and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) methods. A newly developed denoising technique, adaptive nonlocal means (aNLM), was also applied. For each of the 50 patients, three pediatric radiologists evaluated four datasets: full dose plus FBP, half dose plus FBP, half dose plus SAFIRE, and half dose plus aNLM. For each examination, the order of preference for the four datasets was ranked. The organ-specific diagnosis and diagnostic confidence for five primary organs were recorded.
The mean (± SD) volume CT dose index for the full-dose scan was 5.3 ± 2.1 mGy for abdominopelvic examinations and 2.4 ± 1.1 mGy for chest examinations. For abdominopelvic examinations, there was no statistically significant difference between the half dose plus aNLM dataset and the full dose plus FBP dataset (3.6 ± 1.0 vs 3.6 ± 0.9, respectively; p = 0.52), and aNLM performed better than SAFIRE. For chest examinations, there was no statistically significant difference between the half dose plus SAFIRE and the full dose plus FBP (4.1 ± 0.6 vs 4.2 ± 0.6, respectively; p = 0.67), and SAFIRE performed better than aNLM. For all organs, there was more than 85% agreement in organ-specific diagnosis among the three half-dose configurations and the full dose plus FBP configuration.
Although a novel image-based denoising technique performed better than a commercial iterative reconstruction method in pediatric abdominopelvic CT examinations, it performed worse in pediatric chest CT examinations. A 50% dose reduction can be achieved while maintaining diagnostic quality.
本研究的目的是评估一种基于图像的新型去噪技术在儿科腹部盆腔和胸部CT检查中降低辐射剂量的潜力,并将其与一种商业迭代重建方法进行比较。
回顾性收集50例(25例腹部盆腔和25例胸部)临床指征明确的儿科CT检查数据。对于每次检查,使用经过验证的噪声插入工具模拟半剂量数据,这些数据采用滤波反投影(FBP)和正弦图确认迭代重建(SAFIRE)方法进行重建。还应用了一种新开发的去噪技术,自适应非局部均值(aNLM)。对于这50例患者中的每一例,三名儿科放射科医生评估四个数据集:全剂量加FBP、半剂量加FBP、半剂量加SAFIRE和半剂量加aNLM。对于每次检查,对四个数据集的偏好顺序进行排序。记录五个主要器官的器官特异性诊断和诊断置信度。
腹部盆腔检查全剂量扫描的平均(±标准差)容积CT剂量指数为5.3±2.1 mGy,胸部检查为2.4±1.1 mGy。对于腹部盆腔检查,半剂量加aNLM数据集与全剂量加FBP数据集之间无统计学显著差异(分别为3.6±1.0和3.6±0.9;p = 0.52),且aNLM的表现优于SAFIRE。对于胸部检查,半剂量加SAFIRE与全剂量加FBP之间无统计学显著差异(分别为4.1±0.6和4.2±0.6;p = 0.67),且SAFIRE的表现优于aNLM。对于所有器官,三种半剂量配置与全剂量加FBP配置之间在器官特异性诊断方面的一致性超过85%。
尽管一种基于图像的新型去噪技术在儿科腹部盆腔CT检查中的表现优于一种商业迭代重建方法,但在儿科胸部CT检查中表现较差。在保持诊断质量的同时可实现50%的剂量降低。